{
  "id": 8625629,
  "name": "DUPLIN COUNTY v. SUDIE TEACHEY et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Duplin County v. Teachey",
  "decision_date": "1933-03-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "783",
  "last_page": "783",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 N.C. 783"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "156 S. E., 126",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "199 N. C., 188",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "165 S. E., 358",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "203 N. C., 191",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8604176
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/203/0191-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 849,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.509,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.527646540942415e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3479621784899429
    },
    "sha256": "7acb97fad97032e884bf0d62a0136d1e7e30845aa4d1f7766feb7f91603ec5f1",
    "simhash": "1:c6d22e92fa694054",
    "word_count": 149
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:28.108315+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "DUPLIN COUNTY v. SUDIE TEACHEY et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee OueiaM.\nThe proceeding seems to be somewhat anomalous, but .as the pleadings have been omitted from the transcript, and no error is apparent, the appeal will be dismissed on authority of Riggan v. Harrison, 203 N. C., 191, 165 S. E., 358, and Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 188, 156 S. E., 126.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee OueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George R. Ward for plaintiff.",
      "A. J. Blanton and John A. Gavin for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "DUPLIN COUNTY v. SUDIE TEACHEY et al.\n(Filed 22 March, 1933.)\nAppeal by heirs at law from Granmer, J., at December Term, 1932, of Duplin.\nCivil action to foreclose certain tax certificates, and apparently converted into a special proceeding among the defendants for the sale of lands to make assets.\nFrom a judgment establishing certain claims against the estate of M. C. Teachey, deceased, and ordering a sale of lands to pay same, his heirs at law appeal.\nGeorge R. Ward for plaintiff.\nA. J. Blanton and John A. Gavin for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0783-01",
  "first_page_order": 849,
  "last_page_order": 849
}