{
  "id": 8626005,
  "name": "J. W. CONNOR v. R. WALTER ROBINSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Connor v. Robinson",
  "decision_date": "1933-05-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "798",
  "last_page": "799",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 N.C. 798"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 75,
    "char_count": 599,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.489,
    "sha256": "e5270e5729e91d039b5f59ffceba8de4944a2d5d177ebb112ab0fedf8a9a4f70",
    "simhash": "1:40b50dd80d64136f",
    "word_count": 106
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:28.108315+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. W. CONNOR v. R. WALTER ROBINSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nThis was a motion to set aside a judgment for excusable neglect. C. S., 600. Tbe trial court found the facts and set them out in the judgment. Among these is the finding that the procedure of the plaintiff was regular and in full compliance with the law and that there was no mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect on the part of the defendant. Judgment\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "G. T. Carswell and Joe W. Ervin for plaintiff.",
      "J. D. McCall for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. W. CONNOR v. R. WALTER ROBINSON.\n(Filed 10 May, 1933.)\nAppeal by defendant from Warlick, J., at November Term, 1932, of MbcicleNburg.\nAffirmed.\nG. T. Carswell and Joe W. Ervin for plaintiff.\nJ. D. McCall for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0798-01",
  "first_page_order": 864,
  "last_page_order": 865
}