{
  "id": 8627400,
  "name": "STATE v. WARREN PIKE, FLOYD PIKE and LOYD PIKE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pike",
  "decision_date": "1933-09-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "176",
  "last_page": "177",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 N.C. 176"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "166 S. E., 734",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "203 N. C., 601",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8616433
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/203/0601-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "204 N. C., 654",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8623439
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/204/0654-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "90 S. E., 502",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "172 N. C., 977",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11256490
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/172/0977-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 162,
    "char_count": 2018,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.471,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.292217809909693e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2707329655126612
    },
    "sha256": "f4786b2aad42cfc67381aa83c3eec603aeaf411e916b9deecdf82e443e5f4bb0",
    "simhash": "1:e1ef91910fa5fb3a",
    "word_count": 331
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:12:31.066060+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. WARREN PIKE, FLOYD PIKE and LOYD PIKE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, C. J.\nBoth orders of the clerk, purporting to allow tlie defendants to appeal in forma pauperis, were improvidently entered: The first for want of sufficient affidavit to support it (S. v. Martin, 172 N. C., 977, 90 S. E., 502) ; the second for want of authority to allow it at the time. Powell v. Moore, 204 N. C., 654; S. v. Stafford, 203 N. C., 601, 166 S. E., 734.\nThe Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Powell v. Moore, supra.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorneys-General Seawell and Bruton for the State.",
      "George F. Meadows for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. WARREN PIKE, FLOYD PIKE and LOYD PIKE.\n(Filed 20 September, 1933.)\nCriminal Law L b\u2014\nThe clerk is without authority to allow defendant\u2019s application for appeal in -forma, pauperis in a criminal case where the statutory affidavit fails to aver that the application is made in good faith, or defendant\u2019s second application, intended to correct the deficiency in the first, is made more than five months after the adjournment of the term.\nAppeal by defendants from Alley, J., at February Term, 1933, of BuNcombe.\nCriminal prosecution tried on indictment charging the defendants with conspiracy to rob.\nThe case was tried at the February Term, 1933, Buncombe Superior Court, which resulted in conviction and judgment of twelve months on the roads against each of the defendants. Notice of appeal given in open court. Time allowed for preparing statement of case on appeal. Appeal bond fixed at $100.00.\nThereafter, on 7 March, 1933, the clerk of the Superior Court, on certificate of counsel and affidavit, which failed to contain averment that the \u201capplication is in good faith,\u201d entered an order purporting to allow the defendants to appeal in forma pauperis.\nMore than five months later, 18 August, 1933, the defendants undertook to cure the defect in their affidavit of insolvency by filing new application for permission to appeal without giving security for costs. This application was likewise granted.\nAttorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorneys-General Seawell and Bruton for the State.\nGeorge F. Meadows for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0176-01",
  "first_page_order": 240,
  "last_page_order": 241
}