{
  "id": 8630003,
  "name": "A. P. GRICE, Trustee, and R. M. WENDELL, v. AUBURN-ASHEVILLE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Grice v. Auburn-Asheville Co.",
  "decision_date": "1934-03-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "306",
  "last_page": "307",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "206 N.C. 306"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 66,
    "char_count": 519,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.489,
    "sha256": "b6a720f669f3968d72da66c742e66dc6c0bf19b4e544eaa50e6ee0029ba461c6",
    "simhash": "1:1b88546cde248bd9",
    "word_count": 86
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:27:02.537957+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "A. P. GRICE, Trustee, and R. M. WENDELL, v. AUBURN-ASHEVILLE COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "OlakksoN, J\".\n\"We see no error in the judgment of the court below. Tbe remedy of plaintiffs was a motion in the cause. This whole controversy will be heard on its merits in the action, Buncombe County v. Penland. ante. 299. The judgment is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "OlakksoN, J\"."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Carter & Carter for plaintiffs."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. P. GRICE, Trustee, and R. M. WENDELL, v. AUBURN-ASHEVILLE COMPANY.\n(Filed 21 March, 1934.)\n(Por digest see Buncombe Bounty v. PenlanS,, ante, 299.)\nAppeal by plaintiffs from McElroy, J., at November Term, 1933, of BuNcombe.\nAffirmed.\nCarter & Carter for plaintiffs."
  },
  "file_name": "0306-01",
  "first_page_order": 368,
  "last_page_order": 369
}