{
  "id": 8633606,
  "name": "CHARLES T. LEVINESS v. WILLIAM S. MURCHISON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Leviness v. Murchison",
  "decision_date": "1934-06-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "919",
  "last_page": "919",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "206 N.C. 919"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 90,
    "char_count": 777,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.474,
    "sha256": "d2c0ac777d66ea661c7e948a7da9007d0cc68f67c15b3b5530754c02e6951945",
    "simhash": "1:ce36c366b227fbc9",
    "word_count": 133
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:27:02.537957+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "SciiENOic, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "CHARLES T. LEVINESS v. WILLIAM S. MURCHISON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nA careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the evidence is sufficient to carry the case to the jury, hence the verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.\nSciiENOic, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "F. F. Myriclc for plaintiff.",
      "J. S. Griffin for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CHARLES T. LEVINESS v. WILLIAM S. MURCHISON.\n(Filed 20 June, 1934.)\nAppeal by defendant from Sink, J., at August Term, 1933, of Guilford.\nCivil action to recover commissions, or brokerage fees, for effecting a lease of defendant\u2019s hotel.\nUpon denial of liability and issue joined, there was a verdict and judgment for $200.00, from which the defendant appeals, assigning as error the refusal of the court to dismiss the action as in case of nonsuit.\nF. F. Myriclc for plaintiff.\nJ. S. Griffin for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0919-01",
  "first_page_order": 981,
  "last_page_order": 981
}