{
  "id": 8633638,
  "name": "FARMERS PEANUT COMPANY v. MRS. W. F. LUCAS, Administratrix, and STANDARD FERTILIZER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Farmers Peanut Co. v. Lucas",
  "decision_date": "1934-07-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "922",
  "last_page": "922",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "206 N.C. 922"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1523,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.477,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.061447019797991e-08,
      "percentile": 0.31925104513815283
    },
    "sha256": "7fed586cad35878223e0edd8434ab66ba24354d8bc3b09cd914387bc4e9023f3",
    "simhash": "1:d3b7d823ac013bc4",
    "word_count": 254
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:27:02.537957+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "FARMERS PEANUT COMPANY v. MRS. W. F. LUCAS, Administratrix, and STANDARD FERTILIZER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Peb Otjbiam.\nThe admissions in the answer of the appellant and at the trial of this action are sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. In view of these admissions, it is needless to consider the assignments of error relied on by the appellant in this Court. There was no error at the trial. The judgment is affirmed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Peb Otjbiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Privoti & Privoti and, W. D. Pruden for plaintiff.",
      "Coburn & Coburn for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "FARMERS PEANUT COMPANY v. MRS. W. F. LUCAS, Administratrix, and STANDARD FERTILIZER COMPANY.\n(Filed 11 July, 1934.)\nAppeal by defendant, Standard Fertilizer Company, from Small, J., at December Term, 1933, of ChowaN.\nNo error.\nThis is an action to recover the value of certain bags of peanuts sold and delivered to the defendant, Standard Fertilizer Company, by its codefendant. Prior to such sale and delivery, the defendant, Mrs. \"W. F. Lucas, administratrix, and her son, L. H. Lucas, had conveyed the said hags of peanuts to the plaintiff by a chattel mortgage which had been duly recorded. The debt secured by said mortgage had not been paid at the time of such sale and delivery.\nThe issues submitted to the jury were answered as follows:\n\u201c1. Is the plaintiff\u2019s cause of action barred by the statute of limitations? Answer: No.\n2. In what amount, if any, is the defendant, Standard Fertilizer Company, indebted to the plaintiff? Answer: $240.00, with interest from 2 June, 1930.\u201d\nFrom judgment in accordance with the verdict, the defendant, Standard Fertilizer Company, appealed to the Supreme Court.\nPrivoti & Privoti and, W. D. Pruden for plaintiff.\nCoburn & Coburn for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0922-01",
  "first_page_order": 984,
  "last_page_order": 984
}