{
  "id": 8624482,
  "name": "HENRY ANGELOFF v. HEWITT FREEMAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "Angeloff v. Freeman",
  "decision_date": "1934-10-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "207",
  "last_page": "209",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 N.C. 207"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "78 Law Ed., 674",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "L. Ed.",
      "case_ids": [
        1498121
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/291/0097-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 Law Ed., 1060",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "L. Ed.",
      "case_ids": [
        434208
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/283/0318-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "66 S. E., 340",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "151 N. C., 365",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8654887
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/151/0365-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 283,
    "char_count": 5095,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.442,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2072362133854136
    },
    "sha256": "38016d7b850e8c1547362d74375d40010b32516bbbcd5f5b22a259c591cb7c06",
    "simhash": "1:12f68bbede0461fe",
    "word_count": 883
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:17:31.653514+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HENRY ANGELOFF v. HEWITT FREEMAN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nThe Bankruptcy Act provides that upon the appointment of a trustee that such trustee is \u201cvested by operation of law with the title of the bankrupt as of the date he was adjudged a bankrupt,\u201d etc. See U. S. C. A. Title 11, sec. 110. It also provides that the title to the property of a bankrupt which has been sold \u201cshall be conveyed to the purchaser by the trustee.\u201d\nThe adjudication of bankruptcy in Tennessee was made on 14 April, 1933, and thereupon the title to the automobile passed to the trustee by operation of the bankruptcy statute. Moreover, the trustee in bankruptcy conveyed such title as the bankrupt had to the plaintiff, and said sale was duly confirmed. Consequently, the plaintiff could assert in the courts of North Carolina all rights to the property which could be asserted by the trustee in bankruptcy, and was under the circumstances the real party in interest as contemplated by the laws of this State. Hence, the judge ruled correctly. See Ward v. Hargett, 151 N. C., 365, 66 S. E., 340; Straton v. New, 283, 318, 75 Law Ed., 1060; Ex Parte Boldin, 78 Law Ed., 674.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. Pilston Godwin, G. Lee. Richardson, and Thompson & Wilson for plaintiff.",
      "Gosten & Gosten and John H. Hall for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HENRY ANGELOFF v. HEWITT FREEMAN.\n(Filed 10 October, 1934.)\ni. Bankruptcy O b\u2014\nA trustee in bankruptcy is vested with title to tbe bankrupt\u2019s property by operation of law as of tbe date tbe debtor is adjudged a bankrupt, \u00fc. S. O. A. Title 11, sec. 110.\n:3. Bankruptcy G e \u2014 Purchaser at trustee\u2019s sale acqulx-es title of trustee and may assert claim to property as real party in interest.\nWhere tbe trustee in bankruptcy sells a chattel belonging to tbe debtor tbe purchaser obtains tbe title of tbe trustee which vested in tbe trustee by operation of law as of tbe date of tbe adjudication of tbe debtor as a bankrupt, and tbe title of tbe purchaser at tbe trustee\u2019s sale is superior to tbe title of a purchaser at a sheriff\u2019s sale held subsequent to tbe adjudication in bankruptcy under execution on a judgment docketed prior to such adjudication, and tbe purchaser at tbe trustee\u2019s sale is the real party in interest and may assert in tbe courts of this State all rights which could have been asserted by tbe trustee.\nCivil aotiow, before Devin, J., at March Term, 1934, of Gates.\nIn an action in Gates County, entitled \u201cCorporation Commission v. Mrs. Fred T. Carrier,\u201d a judgment for bank stock assessment was duly docketed against her on 8 March, 1930. Mrs. Carrier was a resident of Tennessee and owned a Packard automobile. On or about 1 February, 1933, she left said automobile in the hands of the defendant in Gates County, North Carolina. Thereafter, and prior to 14 April, 1933, Mrs. Carrier filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy in the District Court of the United States for the North Division of the Eastern District of Tennessee, and on said date was duly adjudicated a bankrupt. On 11 May, 1933, Dayton Hunter, of Elizabethton, Tennessee, was duly appointed and qualified as trustee of said bankrupt estate. The automobile was not listed in the schedule and this fact was discovered in the examination of the bankrupt before the referee, and thereupon the bankrupt duly listed said automobile. Thereafter the trustee in bankruptcy, pursuant to an order duly made by the referee, sold the automobile at the postoffice building in Elizabethton, Tennessee, on 4 October, 1933, and the plaintiff became the purchaser thereof for the sum of $10.00, subject to any and all valid liens. Said sale was duly confirmed by the referee in bankruptcy on 18 October, 1933, and a bill of sale was executed and delivered by the trustee to the plaintiff. The plaintiff came to North Carolina and made demand on the defendant for the car, and was informed that on 3 October, 1933, the sheriff of Gates County, under an execution duly issued on the bank assessment judgment, here-inbefore referred to, had duly sold said car at the courthouse door in Gatesville on 14 October, 1933, \u201cwhen and where the defendant Hewitt Freeman became the purchaser thereof for the sum of $256.00,\u201d and that the sheriff of Gates County had executed and delivered to said defendant a bill of sale for the automobile.\nThere was evidence that the trustee in bankruptcy had called upon the defendant several weeks prior to the sheriff\u2019s sale and made an effort to obtain possession of the car, and that there had been considerable correspondence between the trustee in bankruptcy and the defendant.\nAt the conclusion of the evidence the judge instructed the jury to answer the issue of ownership in favor of the plaintiff, and the issue of value in the sum of $258.00, as said amount was the only evidence upon that issue. It appeared from the evidence that the defendant was entitled to a storage lien in the sum of $44.90 upon said car, and thereupon judgment was entered that the plaintiff was the owner of said car and entitled to the possession thereof upon payment to the defendant of the sum of $44.90 storage charges.\nFrom the foregoing judgment the defendant appealed..\nA. Pilston Godwin, G. Lee. Richardson, and Thompson & Wilson for plaintiff.\nGosten & Gosten and John H. Hall for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0207-01",
  "first_page_order": 275,
  "last_page_order": 277
}