{
  "id": 8627271,
  "name": "In re Custody of JAMES LESLIE ALBERTSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Custody of Albertson",
  "decision_date": "1935-01-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "553",
  "last_page": "553",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 N.C. 553"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "184 N. C., 278",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11270155,
        11270135
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/184/0278-02",
        "/nc/184/0278-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "205 N. C., 742",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8631166
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/205/0742-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1221,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.455,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2072777215968962
    },
    "sha256": "abed0548b649fe86d5d32d08c7a32c2df958d5404bed4b4a660102bcdbe0b953",
    "simhash": "1:c8ba78ca6ceb4a1d",
    "word_count": 213
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:17:31.653514+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Staot, C. J., dissents."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "In re Custody of JAMES LESLIE ALBERTSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ClaricsoN, J.\nThis proceeding concerns a writ of habeas corpus instituted by Grace H. Albertson for the custody of James Leslie Albert-son, infant son, about 8 years of age, of Grace H. and W. H. Albertson. The matter bas heretofore been before this Court. In re Albertson, 205 N. C., 742.\nThe brief of petitioner appellant says: \u201cThe appellant concedes that if the judgment of the High Point municipal court is a valid judgment, the petitioner must seek her remedy by a motion in the cause in the municipal court of the city of High Point, In re Blake, 184 N. C., 278. But if the said judgment is a void judgment, it can have no effect whatsoever upon the petitioner\u2019s rights, and habeas corpus will lie to determine the custody of the child.\u201d See In re Albertson, supra. This proceeding is governed by the action of Grace Hulin Albertson v. W. H. Albertson, ante, 547.\nThe judgment of the court below is\nAffirmed.\nStaot, C. J., dissents.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "ClaricsoN, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thomas Turner, Jr., for petitioner Grace E. Albertson.",
      "T. W. Albertson and Walser & Casey for respondent W. E. Albertson."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re Custody of JAMES LESLIE ALBERTSON.\n(Filed 28 January, 1935.)\nAppeal from Glemen\u00ed, J., by Grace H. Albertson, at March Term, 1934, of Guilford.\nAffirmed.\nThomas Turner, Jr., for petitioner Grace E. Albertson.\nT. W. Albertson and Walser & Casey for respondent W. E. Albertson."
  },
  "file_name": "0553-01",
  "first_page_order": 621,
  "last_page_order": 621
}