{
  "id": 8629177,
  "name": "MINNIE MAUDE CAMPBELL v. W. H. CAMPBELL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Campbell v. Campbell",
  "decision_date": "1934-10-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "859",
  "last_page": "860",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 N.C. 859"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "206 N. C., 706",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8632538
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/206/0706-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1283,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.462,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20731131428897978
    },
    "sha256": "9f3f736cd27331300a552ec2b77490b676c8670da148f638be7ddc3fc5159575",
    "simhash": "1:4973eabd267c753a",
    "word_count": 215
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:17:31.653514+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MINNIE MAUDE CAMPBELL v. W. H. CAMPBELL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis was an action for divorce, instituted under chapter 163, Public Laws 1933, C. S., 1659 (a). The issue of residence, marriage, and two-years separation were answered in favor of the plaintiff, hut under the issue numbered three the jury found that the defendant did not abandon the plaintiff without cause. Upon this verdict the plaintiff tendered judgment for absolute divorce, which the court declined to sign, and entered judgment denying the plaintiff a divorce.\nThis case is governed by Long v. Long, 206 N. C., 706. It should be stated, however, that the case at bar was decided before the decision in Long\u2019s case, supra, was rendered.\nUpon the verdict the plaintiff was entitled to a decree of absolute divorce, and the case is remanded to the court below to the end that such decree may be entered.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gavin & Jacleson for appellant.",
      "No counsel for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MINNIE MAUDE CAMPBELL v. W. H. CAMPBELL.\n(Filed 10 October, 1934.)\nDivorce A d\u2014\nEither party may bring an action for absolute divorce on the ground of two-years separation, C. S., 1659 (a), and the jury\u2019s finding that defendant did not abandon plaintiff without cause does not preclude judgment in plaintiff\u2019s favor.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Parker, J., at March Term, 1934, of Lee.\nReversed.\nGavin & Jacleson for appellant.\nNo counsel for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0859-02",
  "first_page_order": 927,
  "last_page_order": 928
}