{
  "id": 8618740,
  "name": "ANNIE W. MASSEY v. MILTON P. MASSEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Massey v. Massey",
  "decision_date": "1935-11-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "818",
  "last_page": "819",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 N.C. 818"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1721,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.445,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2810719060154183e-07,
      "percentile": 0.617547393689748
    },
    "sha256": "cedacacca22f024696b2d57ccfafced7d1e1bf82c24e6fd644f8d220d3a08737",
    "simhash": "1:ce2a228e5b155780",
    "word_count": 281
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:53:32.811961+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ANNIE W. MASSEY v. MILTON P. MASSEY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per CueiaM.\nTbe court below found tbat the facts set forth in the complaint were true, that the plaintiff had not sufficient means whereon to subsist during the prosecution of the suit and to defray the necessary and proper expenses thereof, and thereupon made the order from which defendant appealed.\nThese findings of fact warrant the making of an allowance, and the amount does not appear unreasonable or excessive.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per CueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles P. Green and, Yarborough & Yarborough for plaintiff.",
      "Albert Doub and Thomas W. Puffin for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ANNIE W. MASSEY v. MILTON P. MASSEY.\n(Filed 20 November, 1935.)\nDivorce E a\u2014\nWhere, in a wife\u2019s suit to set aside a deed of separation for fraud and for divorce a mensa,, the trial court finds that the allegations of the complaint are true and that the wife is without means to prosecute the suit and is without means of subsistence, the findings warrant the granting of alimony pendente Ute.\nAppeal by defendant from an order of Williams, J., making certain allowances to the plaintiff pendente lite.\nThe plaintiff brought her action in the Superior Court of Franklin County to set aside for fraud a separation agreement entered into between herself and her husband, the defendant, and for divorce a mensa. Pending the action, she moved for an allowance to herself and for counsel fees, alleging inability to support herself.\nDefendant denied the fraud, set up the separation agreement and payments to the plaintiff under the terms thereof, and resisted the motion.\nNumerous affidavits were filed on both sides. After considering the pleadings and the affidavits, the court below signed the order making allowances to plaintiff and her counsel, from which order defendant appealed.\nCharles P. Green and, Yarborough & Yarborough for plaintiff.\nAlbert Doub and Thomas W. Puffin for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0818-01",
  "first_page_order": 884,
  "last_page_order": 885
}