{
  "id": 8619733,
  "name": "JAMES LOVETT SMITH v. L. R. POWELL, JR., and E. W. SMITH, Receivers of SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Powell",
  "decision_date": "1935-09-18",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "837",
  "last_page": "837",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 N.C. 837"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "161 S. E., 223",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "201 N. C., 840",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628931,
        8628910
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/201/0840-02",
        "/nc/201/0840-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "157 S. E., 136",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "case_ids": [
        2028745
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/sc/159/0405-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "200 N. C., 803",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626604
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/200/0803-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1227,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.501,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20720126926318871
    },
    "sha256": "e8c216329de7769efb9d584d966ebbb933dc1a43ee1ace193daa54c693a302d6",
    "simhash": "1:dbbade9a22386789",
    "word_count": 208
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:53:32.811961+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JAMES LOVETT SMITH v. L. R. POWELL, JR., and E. W. SMITH, Receivers of SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThe Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed in accordance with the usual practice of appellate courts, and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N. C., 803, 157 S. E., 136; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, 161 S. E., 223.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lyon <& Lyon and B. H. Burns & Son for plaintiff.",
      "E. M. Toon and J ohn D. Bellamy & Sons for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JAMES LOVETT SMITH v. L. R. POWELL, JR., and E. W. SMITH, Receivers of SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY.\n(Filed 18 September, 1935.)\nAppeal and Error J d\u2014\nWhere the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.\nAppeal by defendants from Frizzelle, J., at February Term, 1935, of Columbus.\nCivil action to recover damages for loss of plaintiff\u2019s right foot, it being alleged that the injury complained of was caused by the neglect or default of the defendants.\nThe usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence, last clear chance, and damages were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants appeal, assigning errors. ,\nLyon <& Lyon and B. H. Burns & Son for plaintiff.\nE. M. Toon and J ohn D. Bellamy & Sons for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0837-01",
  "first_page_order": 903,
  "last_page_order": 903
}