{
  "id": 8620237,
  "name": "MRS. ETTA HAYES v. CITY OF HICKORY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hayes v. City of Hickory",
  "decision_date": "1935-11-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "845",
  "last_page": "845",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 N.C. 845"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "201 N. C., 840",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628931,
        8628910
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/201/0840-02",
        "/nc/201/0840-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "207 N. C., 862",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629243
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/207/0862-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1417,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.468,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7531458397767592
    },
    "sha256": "a6befd4e17ef8d54f42a73a0dd60893918d2515ad90f03ae95570980861e1830",
    "simhash": "1:dbf3d79a56592205",
    "word_count": 243
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:53:32.811961+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MRS. ETTA HAYES v. CITY OF HICKORY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CueiaM.\nThe Court being evenly divided in opinion, Justice Brogden not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, and .stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. Trust Co. v. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, 207 N. C., 862; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, and cases there cited.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CueiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "L. A. Whitener, Chas. W. Baghy, and C. D. Swift for plaintiff, ap-pellee.",
      "W. A. Self, W. B. Councill, and Bddy S. Merritt for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MRS. ETTA HAYES v. CITY OF HICKORY.\n(Filed 1 November, 1935.)\nAppeal and Error J d\u2014\nWliere the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.\nAppeal from Phillips, J., at February Term, 1935, of Catawba.\nThe defendant city is the appellant from a judgment that the plaintiff have and receive of it the sum of $3,500 as damages for a permanent easement to maintain and operate a sewage disposal plant upon its lands adjoining the lands of the plaintiff and to discharge the effluent from .said plant into Clark\u2019s Creek, and for discharging the defendant from .any further liability for damages to the lands of the plaintiff by reason of the maintenance and operation of said sewage disposal plant. The appellant does not contend that there is no liability from it to the plaintiff, but does contend that the verdict and judgment is excessive.\nL. A. Whitener, Chas. W. Baghy, and C. D. Swift for plaintiff, ap-pellee.\nW. A. Self, W. B. Councill, and Bddy S. Merritt for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0845-01",
  "first_page_order": 911,
  "last_page_order": 911
}