{
  "id": 8620278,
  "name": "MARVIN WHITLEY v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING WORKS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Whitley v. Coca-Cola Bottling Works",
  "decision_date": "1935-11-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "846",
  "last_page": "846",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 N.C. 846"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "156 S. E., 152",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "200 N. C., 55",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8615663
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/200/0055-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "145 S. E., 14",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "196 N. C., 175",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8625380
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/196/0175-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 89,
    "char_count": 786,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.494,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2072053235536126
    },
    "sha256": "f6f2f4219ecf19e9c4f3c63ebeea9197c5f9e04866d2812930f7cec6b92b8fb4",
    "simhash": "1:6e1a841633ac02ed",
    "word_count": 132
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:53:32.811961+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MARVIN WHITLEY v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING WORKS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nThe evidence brings the case within the principles announced in Perry v. Bottling Co., 196 N. C., 175, 145 S. E., 14; Broom v. Bottling Co., 200 N. C., 55, 156 S. E., 152; Enloe v. Bottling Co., ante, 309.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Blount & James for plaintiff.",
      "J. B. Jamas for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MARVIN WHITLEY v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING WORKS.\n(Filed 1 November, 1935.)\nAppeal by defendants from Barnhill, J., at March Term, 1935, of Pitt.\nCivil action to recover damages for alleged negligent injury caused by particles of jagged and broken glass in a bottle of Coca-Cola manufactured by the defendants and swallowed by plaintiff, the ultimate consumer, who purchased the same from a dealer.\nThere was a verdict of $250 and judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal, assigning error.\nBlount & James for plaintiff.\nJ. B. Jamas for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0846-01",
  "first_page_order": 912,
  "last_page_order": 912
}