{
  "id": 8620423,
  "name": "J. Y. MONK and J. M. HOBGOOD, Trading as MONK'S WAREHOUSE, v. F. G. SATTERFIELD, J. S. SATTERFIELD, S. W. STONE, and WALKER STONE, Trading as SATTERFIELD & STONE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Monk v. Satterfield",
  "decision_date": "1935-11-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "847",
  "last_page": "848",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 N.C. 847"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1485,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.422,
    "sha256": "aecdd5268b79f3ef233375ef94f14de56050d22ddbf1c9e079372a1b0edbfb0d",
    "simhash": "1:cf2b6d305b05047f",
    "word_count": 256
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:53:32.811961+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. Y. MONK and J. M. HOBGOOD, Trading as MONK\u2019S WAREHOUSE, v. F. G. SATTERFIELD, J. S. SATTERFIELD, S. W. STONE, and WALKER STONE, Trading as SATTERFIELD & STONE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nThe evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that an agent of the defendants purchased tobacco from the plaintiffs for the defendants, that said tobacco was delivered by the plaintiffs to said agent, and by said agent delivered to the defendants, and that the defendants have failed and refused to pay tie purchase price of said tobacco, to wit: Tie sum of $436.05, was submitted to tie jury, under a charge which is free from error. The testimony of the agent that he was authorized by the defendants to purchase tobacco from the plaintiffs was corroborated by other evidence at the trial.\nWe find no error in the trial. The judgment is in accord with the verdict, and is affirmed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John B. Lewis and Albion Dunn for plaintiff's.",
      "B. I. Satterfield for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. Y. MONK and J. M. HOBGOOD, Trading as MONK\u2019S WAREHOUSE, v. F. G. SATTERFIELD, J. S. SATTERFIELD, S. W. STONE, and WALKER STONE, Trading as SATTERFIELD & STONE.\n(Filed 1 November, 1935.)\nAppeal by defendants from Barnhill, J., at May Term, 1935, of Pitt.\nNo error.\nThe issue submitted to the jury at the trial of this action was answered as follows:\n\u201cAre the defendants indebted to the plaintiffs, and if so, in what amount? Answer: '$436.05, plus interest.\u2019\u201d\nFrom judgment that plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum of $436.05, with interest from 4 November, 1932, and costs, the defendants appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning errors in the trial as appear in the record.\nJohn B. Lewis and Albion Dunn for plaintiff's.\nB. I. Satterfield for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0847-01",
  "first_page_order": 913,
  "last_page_order": 914
}