{
  "id": 8621176,
  "name": "STATE v. ROY HENDERSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Henderson",
  "decision_date": "1935-12-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "856",
  "last_page": "856",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 N.C. 856"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1373,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.437,
    "sha256": "710dfe38eaa5800f34a523c152f2851055124ec90283e8c08fbbb821a9ca388c",
    "simhash": "1:3638f3cf6a108ccb",
    "word_count": 223
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:53:32.811961+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "DeviN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ROY HENDERSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cukiam.\nOn trial the controversy narrowed itself to an issue of fact determinable alone by the jury. The exceptions are not of sufficient moment to call for elaboration or to warrant a new trial; hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.\nDeviN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cukiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General SeaweTl and Assistant Attorney-General Aiken for the Slate.",
      "J. H. Whicker for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ROY HENDERSON.\n(Filed 11 December, 1935.)\nAppeal by defendant from Phillips, J., at August Term, 1935, of Wilkes.\nCriminal prosecution, tried upon indictment charging the defendant, and another, with robbery in violation of ch. 187, Public Laws 1929.\nThe record discloses that on Friday night, 28 June, 1935, three masked men entered the filling station of Sherman Elledge, commanded him to hold up his hands at the point of guns, which he did, took $18 from his person, and helped themselves to other articles in the filling station.\nOne of the highwaymen turned State\u2019s evidence, and he, together with Sherman Elledge and his wife, identified the defendant Roy Henderson as one of the robbers.\nThe defendant pleaded not guilty and offered evidence tending to establish an alibi.\nYerdict: Guilty.\nJudgment: Imprisonment in the State\u2019s Prison for not less than seven nor more than ten years.\nDefendant appeals, assigning errors.\nAttorney-General SeaweTl and Assistant Attorney-General Aiken for the Slate.\nJ. H. Whicker for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0856-01",
  "first_page_order": 922,
  "last_page_order": 922
}