{
  "id": 2221467,
  "name": "STATE v. OBA GODWIN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Godwin",
  "decision_date": "1935-12-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "60",
  "last_page": "61",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 N.C. 60"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "208 N. C., 771",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8617854
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/208/0771-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "146 S. E., 1",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "196 N. C., 457",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8627574
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/196/0457-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "150 S. E., 663",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "198 N. C., 79",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8597675
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/198/0079-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "156 S. E., 143",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "200 N. C., 50",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8615393
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/200/0050-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 159,
    "char_count": 1478,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.471,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.07757614440069673
    },
    "sha256": "9d2e109102416ddc2cc52a549fed77aabb4da8a4462b657fe2fca13a806d8c6c",
    "simhash": "1:17bef205aab001a8",
    "word_count": 264
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:34:31.527681+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. OBA GODWIN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, C. J.\nThe evidence on behalf of the State tends to show that on the night of 23 July, 1933, as a result of a quarrel over a girl at a Negro dance hall and cafe, situate on the road between Aberdeen and Southern Pines, the defendant Oba Godwin shot and killed the deceased under circumstances which the jury found to be murder in the second degree.\nThe plea interposed by the said defendant was that of self-defense. S. v. Bryson, 200 N. C., 50, 156 S. E., 143; S. v. Glenn, 198 N. C., 79, 150 S. E., 663; S. v. Dills, 196 N. C., 457, 146 S. E., 1. The issue of guilt or innocence is sharply joined on the record. The jury alone could determine it. S. v. Lawson, ante, 59; S. v. Anderson, 208 N. C., 771.\nThe trial is free from reversible error, hence the verdict and judgment must be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Seawell and Assistant Attorney-General Aiken for the State.",
      "W. R. Clegg for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. OBA GODWIN.\n(Filed 11 December, 1935.)\nCriminal Law L e\u2014\nTbe. verdict of tbe jury upon conflicting evidence is final when no reversible error is committed upon tbe trial.\nAppeal by defendant Oba Godwin from Shaw, Emergency Judge, at August Special Term, 1935, of Moo be.\nCriminal prosecution, tried upon indictment charging the defendant with the murder of one Peter Harrington.\nVerdict: Guilty of murder iu the second degree.\nJudgment: Imprisonment in the State\u2019s Prison for not less than six nor more than ten years.\nDefendant appeals, assigning errors.\nAttorney-General Seawell and Assistant Attorney-General Aiken for the State.\nW. R. Clegg for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0060-01",
  "first_page_order": 122,
  "last_page_order": 123
}