{
  "id": 2221282,
  "name": "NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. J. WALTER LAMBETH, Administrator of JOHN W. LAMBETH, Deceased",
  "name_abbreviation": "New York Life Insurance v. Lambeth",
  "decision_date": "1936-01-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "294",
  "last_page": "296",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 N.C. 294"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 256,
    "char_count": 4002,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.482,
    "sha256": "008e61b50438e2fd5d50daf19d81882b07970e996c4084872dbfe45a16d49027",
    "simhash": "1:12d36c2d605c4d35",
    "word_count": 672
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:34:31.527681+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. J. WALTER LAMBETH, Administrator of JOHN W. LAMBETH, Deceased."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Clarkson, J.'\nThis ease is governed by the decision this day filed in the action o\u00a3 New York Life Insurance Co. v. C. T. Lassiter and wife, Eunice M. Lassiter, ante, 156.\nErom the view we take of the matter it is unnecessary to consider the other contentions set forth in the agreed statement of facts as to the marketability of the title. We do not think the plaintiff can deliver to the defendant a marketable title \u2014 a good and indefeasible title in fee simple. The reasons therefor are fully set forth in the case above cited.\nThe judgment of the court below is\nAffirmed.\nDevin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Clarkson, J.'"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Eugene G. Shaw, Thos. G. Hoyle, and Frank P. Hohgood for plaintiff.",
      "Dalton & Pickens for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. J. WALTER LAMBETH, Administrator of JOHN W. LAMBETH, Deceased.\n(Filed 22 January, 1936.)\nFor digest, see Ins. Go. v. Lassiter, ante, 156.\nAppeal by plaintiff from McElroy, J., at 15 April Term, 1935. From Guilford.\nAffirmed.\nPlaintiff and defendant\u2019s intestate entered into a contract dated 6 July, 1933, by which the plaintiff agreed to sell defendant\u2019s intestate a tract or lot of land located on North Main Street in the city of High Point, North Carolina, of the dimensions of 31 feet by 100 feet, as described in the contract for the price of $26,000. The contract provided that \u201cshould the title be unmarketable and be rejected therefor by the purchaser,\u201d the sum of $3,000 paid as earnest money by the defendant\u2019s intestate would be returned. At the time stipulated in the contract for the completion of the sale, the defendant\u2019s intestate notified the plaintiff that the plaintiff\u2019s title to the property involved was not marketable, and refused to accept plaintiff\u2019s deed therefor.\nThe defendant\u2019s intestate demanded the return of the $3,000 paid as earnest money on said date. This action was commenced by plaintiff against defendant\u2019s intestate on 17 April, 1934, for specific performance of the contract. Defendant\u2019s intestate answering denied the marketability of the title tendered, and set up counterclaim for the $3,000 earnest money paid, and interest from the date of its return was demanded. During the pendency of the action, the defendant\u2019s intestate died and his personal representative, the defendant, was substituted in his stead.\nUpon the case coming on to be heard upon agreed statement of facts, the court below rendered the following judgment: \u201cThis cause coming on to be heard at the 15 April Term of Guilford Superior Court, before Hon. P. A. McElroy, judge presiding, and being heard upon agreed statement of case filed herein by the plaintiff and defendant, and arguments of counsel for the plaintiff and defendant, a jury trial having been waived, and it appearing to the court, and the court finding as a matter of law upon the facts agreed that the title to the real property described in the complaint, which title was tendered by the plaintiff to the defendant in execution of the terms of the contract of sale, is unmarket: able, and the plaintiff is unable, and was unable on 11 July, 1933, to convey to the defendant\u2019s intestate, or to said intestate\u2019s representative, such title as was contemplated in said contract of sale: Wherefore, upon said facts agreed, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff\u2019s action be and same is hereby dismissed, and that the plaintiff take nothing by its action. It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the defendant J. Walter Lambeth, administrator of John W. Lambeth, deceased, have and recover of the said plaintiff New York Life Insurance Company the sum of $3,000, with interest thereon from 12 July, 1933, until paid. It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the plaintiff New York Life Insurance Company be taxed with the costs of this action, to be assessed by the clerk. P. A. McElroy, Judge presiding.\u201d\nTo the judgment as signed the plaintiff excepted, assigned error, and appealed to the Supreme Court.\nEugene G. Shaw, Thos. G. Hoyle, and Frank P. Hohgood for plaintiff.\nDalton & Pickens for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0294-01",
  "first_page_order": 356,
  "last_page_order": 358
}