{
  "id": 8629691,
  "name": "MINNIE GETTYS v. CLAY BLANTON et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gettys v. Blanton",
  "decision_date": "1936-10-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "836",
  "last_page": "837",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "210 N.C. 836"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "101 S. E., 214",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "178 N. C., 571",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11273284
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/178/0571-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "175 S. E., 306",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "206 N. C., 856",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8633254
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/206/0856-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "178 S. E., 565",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "207 N. C., 771",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628461
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/207/0771-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1221,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.497,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20732173960721262
    },
    "sha256": "e10172dedc54e6d33f8b36b40abfbef27d8c03930dc2fad4364cf146b8382896",
    "simhash": "1:ef072eb9da27a180",
    "word_count": 211
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:57:05.250790+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MINNIE GETTYS v. CLAY BLANTON et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe record in this case is not altogether clear, albeit the single exception \u201cto the signing of the judgment,\u201d appearing on the record, limits the appeal to the sufficiency of the concessions and findings to support the judgment. Blades v. Trust Co., 207 N. C., 771, 178 S. E., 565; Wilson v. Charlotte, 206 N. C., 856, 175 S. E., 306; Mfg. Co. v. Lbr. Co., 178 N. C., 571, 101 S. E., 214.\nIn this view of the matter, we cannot say that error has been shown. Hence, the judgment will be\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Quinn, Hamrick & Hamrick for plaintiff, appellee.",
      "T. J. Moss for defendants, appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MINNIE GETTYS v. CLAY BLANTON et al.\n(Filed 14 October, 1936.)\nAppeal and Error P b\u2014\nAn exception to tbe signing of tbe judgment limits tbe appeal to the sufficiency of tbe concessions and findings to support tbe judgment.\nAppeal by defendants from Pless, J'., at May Term, 1936, of RUTHERFORD.\nCivil action in ejectment and to recover rents.\nDemurrer originally interposed, but upon tbe bearing tbe parties seem to have agreed that tbe judge might determine tbe case on certain concessions and findings. This was done and resulted in judgment for plaintiff.\n\u201cDefendants except to tbe signing of tbe judgment,\u201d and appeal.\nQuinn, Hamrick & Hamrick for plaintiff, appellee.\nT. J. Moss for defendants, appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0836-01",
  "first_page_order": 902,
  "last_page_order": 903
}