{
  "id": 8629811,
  "name": "JOHN F. DEES, Administrator, v. HALL BALLARD et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dees v. Ballard",
  "decision_date": "1936-12-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "841",
  "last_page": "842",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "210 N.C. 841"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1112,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.463,
    "sha256": "c471f59dcc5bbe11fa703c666f07ae8d5a75d9fa277db2423aa27753a8591f19",
    "simhash": "1:b313f51c6110613d",
    "word_count": 183
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:57:05.250790+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOHN F. DEES, Administrator, v. HALL BALLARD et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nIt was alleged that Ballard was in the employ of the defendant Everett at the time of the collision, transporting \u201chands\u201d to his threshing machine. The evidence fails to support this allegation. There was no error in dismissing the action as to the defendant Everett.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William G. Pittman, Douglass & Douglass, and, B. L. McMillcm for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Jones & Jones for defendants, appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOHN F. DEES, Administrator, v. HALL BALLARD et al.\n(Filed 16 December, 1936.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Shaw, Emergency Judge, at May Term, 1936, of RICHMOND.\nCivil action to recover damages for death of plaintiff\u2019s intestate, a boy seven years of age, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of the defendants.\nOn 3 July, 1934, an automobile in which, plaintiff\u2019s intestate was riding collided with a car owned and operated at the time by Hall Ballard.\nThere was a verdict and judgment against the defendant Ballard for $650.00.\nPlaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit entered, at the close of all the evidence, in favor of the defendant John L. Everett, Jr.\nWilliam G. Pittman, Douglass & Douglass, and, B. L. McMillcm for plaintiff, appellant.\nJones & Jones for defendants, appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0841-02",
  "first_page_order": 907,
  "last_page_order": 908
}