(Filed 14 October, 1936.)
Appeal and Error P b—
An exception to tbe signing of tbe judgment limits tbe appeal to the sufficiency of tbe concessions and findings to support tbe judgment.
Appeal by defendants from Pless, J'., at May Term, 1936, of RUTHERFORD.
Civil action in ejectment and to recover rents.
Demurrer originally interposed, but upon tbe bearing tbe parties seem to have agreed that tbe judge might determine tbe case on certain concessions and findings. This was done and resulted in judgment for plaintiff.
“Defendants except to tbe signing of tbe judgment,” and appeal.
*837 Quinn, Hamrick & Hamrick for plaintiff, appellee.
T. J. Moss for defendants, appellants.
The record in this case is not altogether clear, albeit the single exception “to the signing of the judgment,” appearing on the record, limits the appeal to the sufficiency of the concessions and findings to support the judgment. Blades v. Trust Co., 207 N. C., 771, 178 S. E., 565; Wilson v. Charlotte, 206 N. C., 856, 175 S. E., 306; Mfg. Co. v. Lbr. Co., 178 N. C., 571, 101 S. E., 214.
In this view of the matter, we cannot say that error has been shown. Hence, the judgment will be
Affirmed.