{
  "id": 8625075,
  "name": "IN THE MATTER OF THE LIQUIDATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re the Liquidation of the North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.",
  "decision_date": "1937-01-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "145",
  "last_page": "145",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 N.C. 145"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 92,
    "char_count": 983,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.478,
    "sha256": "aac5ed2e48a6123cdfe2daebe339c6c462ff0470bf008f6bd9909b05e47be920",
    "simhash": "1:f98c20ef7ecf3678",
    "word_count": 166
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:14.990140+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN THE MATTER OF THE LIQUIDATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "CoNNOR, J.\nThere is no error in the order in the instant case. It is affirmed. See Powell v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, ante, 137.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "CoNNOR, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lovelace \u2022& Kirlcman for petitioner.",
      "Yorle & Boyd for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN THE MATTER OF THE LIQUIDATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY.\n(Filed 27 January, 1937.)\nAppeal by respondent from Rousseau, J., at June Term, 1936, of G-uileord.\nAffirmed.\nThis matter was heard on the petition of J. F. Cannon, for an order directing J. T. Gfobbel, agent and conservator of the North Carolina Bank and Trust Company, an insolvent banking corporation, to pay his claim against said corporation out of certain assets in the hands of the respondent.\nOn the facts alleged in the petition and admitted in the answer, it was ordered by the court that respondent pay the claim of the petitioner out of assets in his hands, delivered to him by the Eeeonstruetion Finance Corporation.\nEespondent appealed to the Supreme Court, assigning error in the order.\nLovelace \u2022& Kirlcman for petitioner.\nYorle & Boyd for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0145-01",
  "first_page_order": 211,
  "last_page_order": 211
}