{
  "id": 8626694,
  "name": "THE FARMERS BANK OF CLAYTON v. NELLIE HORNE McCULLERS et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Farmers Bank of Clayton v. McCullers",
  "decision_date": "1937-03-17",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "327",
  "last_page": "328",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 N.C. 327"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "156 S. E., 126",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "199 N. C., 788",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8615941
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/199/0788-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "165 S. E., 358",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "203 N. C., 191",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8604176
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/203/0191-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "181 S. E., 328",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "208 N. C., 416",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8608691
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/208/0416-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "175 S. E., 713",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "207 N. C., 47",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8622362
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/207/0047-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "172 S. E., 348",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "205 N. C., 785",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8631487
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/205/0785-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 S. E., 566",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "101 N. C., 428",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8650850
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/101/0428-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "155 S. E., 564",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "199 N. C., 667",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8612356
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/199/0667-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "139 S. E., 244",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "194 N. C., 239",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8602287
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/194/0239-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "178 S. E., 113",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "207 N. C., 652",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8627920
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/207/0652-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 236,
    "char_count": 2708,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.502,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2533549498694304e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6106838661250135
    },
    "sha256": "80061efc93f583c76ce357ae798e9e7b5cefee0c7b3ec5b9c903cf7f9c66e28f",
    "simhash": "1:9748ba43bc52bdf2",
    "word_count": 491
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:14.990140+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THE FARMERS BANK OF CLAYTON v. NELLIE HORNE McCULLERS et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, C. J.\nIt is stipulated by counsel \u201cthat the original records in the cases are not necessary on the appeal, and are therefore omitted by consent.\u201d This is fatal to the appeal. Ins. Co. v. Bullard, 207 N. C., 652, 178 S. E., 113. Compare Corp. Com. v. Trust Co., 194 N. C., 239, 139 S. E., 244. It is provided by Rule 19, sec. 1, of the Rules of Practice that \u201cthe pleadings on which the case is tried, the issues, and the judgment appealed from shall be a part of the transcript in all cases.\u201d The pleadings are essential in order that we may be advised as to the nature of the action or proceeding. Waters v. Waters, 199 N. C., 667, 155 S. E., 564.\nThe record consists of certain judgments, orders, and reports. No written motion or application of appellant appears in the transcript. Indeed, the judgment from which the appeal is taken contains no reference to such motion. The record is too meager \u201cto establish the jurisdiction of this Court and put it in efficient relation and connection with the-court below.\u201d Walton v. McKesson, 101 N. C., 428, 7 S. E., 566; Payne v. Brown, 205 N. C., 785, 172 S. E., 348. Failure to send up adequate record has uniformly resulted in dismissal of the appeal. S. v. Lbr. Co., 207 N. C., 47, 175 S. E., 713. Judicial knowledge arises only from what properly appears on the record. Goodman v. Goodman, 208 N. C., 416, 181 S. E., 328; Ins. Co. v. Bullard, supra.\nOn the authorities cited, and others of similar import, the attempted appeal must be dismissed. Riggan v. Harrison, 203 N. C., 191, 165 S. E., 358; Waters v. Waters, supra; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788, 156 S. E., 126.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Parker & Lee for L. T. Pose, appellant.",
      "Abell & Shepard for J. L. George and A. A. Corbett, appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE FARMERS BANK OF CLAYTON v. NELLIE HORNE McCULLERS et al.\n(Filed 17 March, 1937.)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7\u00a7 19, 31f\u2014\nThe pleadings are a necessary part of the record and may not be omitted by consent of the parties, and where the record is inadequate to establish the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and put it in efficient relation and connection with the court below, the appeal will be dismissed. Rule of Practice in the Supreme Court, No. 19, sec. 1.\nAppeal by L. T. Rose, agent of plaintiff, from Cranmer, J., at September Term, 1936, of JohNstoN.\nMotion by L. T. Rose for allowance out of funds in hands of receiver for services rendered in \u201creceivership had in proceedings supplemental to execution.\u201d\nFrom order directing the receiver to pay out all funds in his hands, and \u201cto complete his liquidation of said estate as early as practicable and file his final report herein,\u201d the movant, \u201cL. T. Rose, agent of the plaintiff bank,\u201d excepts and appeals.\nParker & Lee for L. T. Pose, appellant.\nAbell & Shepard for J. L. George and A. A. Corbett, appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0327-01",
  "first_page_order": 393,
  "last_page_order": 394
}