{
  "id": 8629068,
  "name": "LOU WILSON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1937-01-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "731",
  "last_page": "731",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 N.C. 731"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "210 N. C., 394",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626490
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/210/0394-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "186 S. E., 486",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "210 N. C., 394",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626490
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/210/0394-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 1069,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.507,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20730841836724845
    },
    "sha256": "4265433e5fa7cde0c13e34db7ea6932c90a4ce9081e2b865a642044acbc5e735",
    "simhash": "1:590d6ddd12b79bad",
    "word_count": 176
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:14.990140+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "LOU WILSON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nIn principle, the facts of the instant case are identical with those appearing in the case of Fulton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 210 N. C., 394, 186 S. E., 486. The master policy is the same. The judgment of nonsuit affirmed in the Fulton case, supra, is authority for the judgment entered here.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "P. T. Stiers for plaintiff, appellant. x",
      "Manly, Hendren & Womble and W. P. Bandridge for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "LOU WILSON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.\n(Filed 6 January, 1937.)\nInsurance \u00a7 Sid\u2014\nIn' tins action on a disability clause in a certificate under an employees\u2019 group policy, judgment of nonsuit in insurer\u2019s favor is affirmed under authority of Fulton v. Insurance Oo., 210 N. C., 394.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Rousseau, J., at November Term, 1935, of Rockingham:.\nCivil action to recover on certificate of group insurance issued by defendant to plaintiff as an employee of the Riverside and Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc.\nFrom judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of all the evidence, plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.\nP. T. Stiers for plaintiff, appellant. x\nManly, Hendren & Womble and W. P. Bandridge for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0731-01",
  "first_page_order": 797,
  "last_page_order": 797
}