{
  "id": 8617515,
  "name": "CAROLINA TRANSPORTATION & DISTRIBUTING COMPANY and WOLFE & CRANE COMPANY v. AMERICAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Carolina Transportation & Distributing Co. v. American Alliance Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1937-12-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "665",
  "last_page": "666",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "212 N.C. 665"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "203 N. C., 218",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8605731,
        8605604
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/203/0218-02",
        "/nc/203/0218-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1862,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.479,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.317852702137001e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4388891012564825
    },
    "sha256": "0fa163eb36d9c2f9dd5d17f90ad86865f72a497de6b955f572be9c47d2b0cbe4",
    "simhash": "1:c07ee52a14fe08d9",
    "word_count": 304
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:30:43.466662+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CAROLINA TRANSPORTATION & DISTRIBUTING COMPANY and WOLFE & CRANE COMPANY v. AMERICAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis was an action brought in the municipal court of the city of High Point on an insurance policy issued by the defendant to the transportation company insuring the insured, inter alia, against loss by reason of legal liability as a carrier for loss of goods.\nOn motion of the plaintiffs, judgment on the pleadings was rendered in the municipal court to the effect that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover of the defendant the sum of $3,191-10, with interest. To this judgment the defendant excepted and appealed to the Superior Court.\nThe Superior Court affirmed the judgment of the municipal court with the modification that an issue as to the amount of the recovery should have been submitted to a jury, and remanded the case to the municipal court that such an issue might there be submitted. To this judgment the defendant excepted and appeal\u00e9d to the Supreme Court.\nThe judgment from which the defendant appeals to this Court is not a final judgment, and for that reason the appeal is premature, and must be dismissed. Smith v. Matthews, 203 N. C., 218, and cases there cited.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roberson, Haworth & Reese for plaintiffs, appellees.",
      "Smith, Wharton & Hudgins for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CAROLINA TRANSPORTATION & DISTRIBUTING COMPANY and WOLFE & CRANE COMPANY v. AMERICAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY.\n(Filed 15 December, 1937.)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 2 \u2014 Judgment appealed from held not final judgment, and appeal is dismissed as premature.\nIn this action on a policy of indemnity insurance, insurer\u2019s appeal from judgment of the Superior Court affirming the judgment of the municipal court in insured\u2019s favor, with the modification that an issue as to the amount of the recovery be submitted to a jury, is held premature and is dismissed.\nAppeal by defendant from Armstrong, J., at March Term, 1937, of Guilpord.\nAppeal dismissed.\nRoberson, Haworth & Reese for plaintiffs, appellees.\nSmith, Wharton & Hudgins for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0665-01",
  "first_page_order": 735,
  "last_page_order": 736
}