{
  "id": 8630824,
  "name": "JOHN J. MILLS and Wife, SUDIE MILLS, v. MARY E. JONES",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mills v. Jones",
  "decision_date": "1938-04-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "802",
  "last_page": "802",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "213 N.C. 802"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 1165,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.506,
    "sha256": "b224ae3308d7d4ebb3c34fae4beb4defef76e2308b50ab19941e36684aa06b8b",
    "simhash": "1:da22f7d1741ea44b",
    "word_count": 193
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:08:52.368812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOHN J. MILLS and Wife, SUDIE MILLS, v. MARY E. JONES."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe Court being evenly divided in opinion, Connor, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, as the disposition of this appeal, without becoming a precedent, in accord with the practice of the Court. Collins v. Ins. Co., ante, 800.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jach Spain and Albion Dunn for plaintiffs, appellants.",
      "J. B. J ames for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOHN J. MILLS and Wife, SUDIE MILLS, v. MARY E. JONES.\n(Filed 13 April, 1938.)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 38\u2014\nWhen the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.\nAppeal, from Grady, J., at .February Term, 1938, of Pitt.\nThis is an action wherein the plaintiffs filed complaint which they contend stated a cause of action to graft a parol trust upon a deed taken by the defendant from a commissioner appointed to foreclose a mortgage, and which the defendant contends failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court held with the contention of the defendant and entered judgment sustaining the demurrer filed, from which judgment plaintiffs appealed, assigning error.\nJach Spain and Albion Dunn for plaintiffs, appellants.\nJ. B. J ames for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0802-01",
  "first_page_order": 866,
  "last_page_order": 866
}