{
  "id": 8633153,
  "name": "ELIZABETH M. HARRELL v. CARL GOERCH and \"THE STATE,\" a Magazine",
  "name_abbreviation": "Harrell v. Goerch",
  "decision_date": "1938-09-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "819",
  "last_page": "820",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "214 N.C. 819"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "184 S. E., 489",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "209 N. C., 741",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2221597
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/209/0741-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1030,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.474,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2073752176285181
    },
    "sha256": "9909599f9e68e815830ae9091aaf779a423e116f0caccb574a6787840417de81",
    "simhash": "1:91f30c8df9502039",
    "word_count": 167
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:13.292364+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ELIZABETH M. HARRELL v. CARL GOERCH and \u201cTHE STATE,\u201d a Magazine."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nThe record on this appeal shows that the case has been properly submitted to the jury in accordance with the decision on former appeal. We have given careful consideration to all of plaintiff\u2019s assignments of error, and find\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gulley & Gulley for \u25a0plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Bunn \u25a0& Arendell for defendants, appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ELIZABETH M. HARRELL v. CARL GOERCH and \u201cTHE STATE,\u201d a Magazine.\n(Filed 28 September, 1938.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Williams, J., at June Term, 1938, of Halifax.\nCivil action for libel.\nDecision on former appeal is reported in 209 N. C., 741, 184 S. E., 489.\nThe allegations and evidence are sufficiently stated there. A repetition of them is unnecessary here. On the retrial below the jury answered these issues in the affirmative: \u201c(1) Did the defendant publish of and concerning the plaintiff the article as alleged in the complaint? (2) If so, was it true?\u201d Other issues were not answered.\nFrom judgment thereupon for defendants, plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court, and assigns error.\nGulley & Gulley for \u25a0plaintiff, appellant.\nBunn \u25a0& Arendell for defendants, appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0819-02",
  "first_page_order": 887,
  "last_page_order": 888
}