{
  "id": 8633268,
  "name": "MRS. JOHN THOMAS JOHNSTON et al. v. HALIFAX PAPER COMPANY et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Johnston v. Halifax Paper Co.",
  "decision_date": "1938-10-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "828",
  "last_page": "829",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "214 N.C. 828"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "191 S. E., 353",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "211 N. C., 591",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628228
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/211/0591-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1235,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.495,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20737714824300568
    },
    "sha256": "63140fdb480492bf743742b1d4d1c5c017a7778c6aa50be94e98b135a397cbf9",
    "simhash": "1:c06b56b642aa018f",
    "word_count": 199
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:13.292364+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MRS. JOHN THOMAS JOHNSTON et al. v. HALIFAX PAPER COMPANY et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nOne member of tbe Court, Schenclc, J., not sitting, and tbe remaining six being equally divided in opinion as to tbe sufficiency of tbe evidence to support tbe award, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court is affirmed in accordance witb tbe usual practice in sucb cases, and stands as tbe decision in tbe present case, without becoming a precedent. Cole v. R. R., 211 N. C., 591, 191 S. E., 353.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gold, McAnally & Gold and Long & Grew for plaintiffs, appellees.",
      "Sapp & Sapp for defendants, appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MRS. JOHN THOMAS JOHNSTON et al. v. HALIFAX PAPER COMPANY et al.\n(Filed 12 October, 1938.)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 38\u2014\nWhen tbe Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.\nAppeal by defendants from Parker, J., at August Term, 1938, of Halifax.\nProceeding under Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act to determine liability of defendants to next^of kin of John Tbomas Jobnston, deceased employee.\nTbe Industrial Commission overruled tbe trial Commissioner and awarded compensation. Tbis was affirmed on appeal to tbe Superior Court.\nDefendants appeal, assigning as error tbe insufficiency of tbe evidence to support tbe award.\nGold, McAnally & Gold and Long & Grew for plaintiffs, appellees.\nSapp & Sapp for defendants, appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0828-02",
  "first_page_order": 896,
  "last_page_order": 897
}