{
  "id": 8633464,
  "name": "WILLIAM H. LECHLER v. PRECISION GEAR & MACHINE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lechler v. Precision Gear & Machine Co.",
  "decision_date": "1938-11-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "842",
  "last_page": "843",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "214 N.C. 842"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1029,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.459,
    "sha256": "1021f72f6b222076da13a77d9e6e7c30b9909ce3ed8eccc7a01969ae1e62816e",
    "simhash": "1:de3ac06c944fbe4c",
    "word_count": 166
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:13.292364+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WILLIAM H. LECHLER v. PRECISION GEAR & MACHINE COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nOn controverted issues of fact, the jury has responded in favor of the plaintiff. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the pertinent decisions on the subject and agreeably to the principles of law applicable. We have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. The exceptions to the charge are not sustained. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henry L. Strickland for plaintiff, appellee.",
      "William Winter and J. F. Flowers for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILLIAM H. LECHLER v. PRECISION GEAR & MACHINE COMPANY.\n(Filed 23 November, 1938.)\nAppeal by defendant from Olive, Special Judge, at February Special Term, 1938, of Mecklenbubg.\nCivil action to recover damages for breach of contract of employment.\nUpon denial of liability and issues joined, there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nHenry L. Strickland for plaintiff, appellee.\nWilliam Winter and J. F. Flowers for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0842-01",
  "first_page_order": 910,
  "last_page_order": 911
}