{
  "id": 8633478,
  "name": "STATE v. MARY DAVIS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Davis",
  "decision_date": "1938-12-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "843",
  "last_page": "843",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "214 N.C. 843"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "139 S. E., 448",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "194 N. C., 277",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8604175
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/194/0277-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "127 S. E., 208",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "189 N. C., 322",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8654180
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/189/0322-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "114 S. E., 168",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "184 N. C., 676",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11272031
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/184/0676-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1128,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.45,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2073810094719808
    },
    "sha256": "af42707c1136e308faaa443d460ca4e7360d681a26be35d022507d6bc018d80a",
    "simhash": "1:15a5c29d0f580b1b",
    "word_count": 194
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:13.292364+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. MARY DAVIS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of High Point of operating a lottery, 1 September, 1937, and the following judgment entered:\n\u201cJudgment: Pe confined in the county jail for six months to be assigned to work in the workhouse, execution to issue at any time within three years and pay jury costs.\u201d\nOn 26 February, 1938, the sentence was ordered into effect by the judge of the municipal court and defendant put in custody to begin service of sentence. Upon appeal to the Superior Court, it was held that defendant\u2019s imprisonment was valid and legal, and thereupon defendant appealed to the Supreme Court.\nThe ruling of the court below is upheld under authority of S. v. Vickers, 184 N. C., 676, 114 S. E., 168; S. v. McAfee, 189 N. C., 322, 127 S. E., 208; and S. v. Schlichter, 194 N. C., 277, 139 S. E., 448.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton and Wettach for the State.",
      "Gold, McAnally & Gold for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. MARY DAVIS.\n(Filed 14 December, 1938.)\nAppeal by defendant from Pless, J., at April Term, 1938, of G-uil-pord.\nAffirmed.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton and Wettach for the State.\nGold, McAnally & Gold for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0843-01",
  "first_page_order": 911,
  "last_page_order": 911
}