{
  "id": 8632187,
  "name": "IRA PAGE, Trading as PAGE OIL COMPANY, v. I. B. McLAMB",
  "name_abbreviation": "Page v. McLamb",
  "decision_date": "1939-06-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "789",
  "last_page": "789",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "215 N.C. 789"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "214 N. C., 188",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629367
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/214/0188-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "198 N. C., 193",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8602347
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/198/0193-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 1521,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.485,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.795970579509156e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5326325974989276
    },
    "sha256": "89379c56e3bd38bd200254d835f18084ca69650939600d03879910d73d350a29",
    "simhash": "1:40f6ffe325d8760f",
    "word_count": 256
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:25:15.554902+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IRA PAGE, Trading as PAGE OIL COMPANY, v. I. B. McLAMB."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis is an action to recover property damage caused by a collision of tbe plaintiff\u2019s tractor and trailer with tbe defendant\u2019s truck upon tbe public highway.\nThere was allegation and evidence tending to prove tbat tbe defendant\u2019s truck was parked at least partially on tbe bard surface of tbe road in tbe nighttime without lights either in front or rear, and tbat tbe driver of tbe plaintiff\u2019s tractor did not observe tbe truck in time to avoid colliding with it. This was sufficient to deny tbe defendant\u2019s motion for nonsuit. Williams v. Express Lines, 198 N. C., 193; Cole v. Koonce, 214 N. C., 188; Clarke v. Martin, ante, 405.\nWe have examined tbe exceptions preserved to portions of the evidence and find therein no prejudicial error.\nSince tbe jury, under a charge to wbicb no exceptions were taken, has answered tbe issues against tbe defendant, tbe judgment predicated upon tbe verdict must be affirmed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Oscar G. Barker for plaintiff, appellee.",
      "Ezra Parker and Bennett & McDonald for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IRA PAGE, Trading as PAGE OIL COMPANY, v. I. B. McLAMB.\n(Filed 16 June, 1939.)\nAutomobiles \u00a7\u00a7 14, 18g\u2014\nEvidence tbat defendant\u2019s truck was parked on tbe side of the highway, at least partially on the hard surface, without lights, rear or front, and that the driver of plaintiff\u2019s tractor did not observe the truck in time to avoid colliding with it, is held sufficient to overrule defendant\u2019s motion to nonsuit.\nAppeal by defendant from Nimocks, J., at January Term, 1939, of DURHAM.\nOscar G. Barker for plaintiff, appellee.\nEzra Parker and Bennett & McDonald for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0789-01",
  "first_page_order": 855,
  "last_page_order": 855
}