{
  "id": 8614242,
  "name": "FLOYD A. FISHER, Administrator, v. TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fisher v. Town of Waynesville",
  "decision_date": "1939-09-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "790",
  "last_page": "790",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "216 N.C. 790"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1084,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.527,
    "sha256": "677bc045b45282a7f314400afaa80d6354b92b07612be3c49171ffa9f62da21c",
    "simhash": "1:179b7e9b52990906",
    "word_count": 174
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:30.134660+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "FLOYD A. FISHER, Administrator, v. TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence, the rulings on the motions to nonsuit, and the assignments of error directed to portions of the charge apparently present no new question of law or one not heretofore settled by a number of decisions. Our impression is that no serious harm has come to the defendant in the-particulars pointed out by its exceptions. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Grover C. Davis and Sale, Pennell & Pennell for plaintiff, appellee.",
      "Morgan & Ward and F. E. Alley, Jr., for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "FLOYD A. FISHER, Administrator, v. TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE.\n(Filed 20 September, 1939.)\nAppeal by defendant from Alley, J., at May Term, 1989, of Haywood.\nCivil action to recover damages for death of plaintiff\u2019s intestate alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of the defendant.\nUpon denial of liability, the case was tried upon- the usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff.\nDefendant appeals, assigning errors.\nGrover C. Davis and Sale, Pennell & Pennell for plaintiff, appellee.\nMorgan & Ward and F. E. Alley, Jr., for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0790-01",
  "first_page_order": 856,
  "last_page_order": 856
}