{
  "id": 8614420,
  "name": "JOSEPH B. PATRICK v. SIR WALTER CHEVROLET COMPANY, a Corporation",
  "name_abbreviation": "Patrick v. Sir Walter Chevrolet Co.",
  "decision_date": "1939-09-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "792",
  "last_page": "792",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "216 N.C. 792"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 94,
    "char_count": 1010,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.48,
    "sha256": "e819dc882e7c1d089792d112c202e6d699112b3eb0589723f45b88c069e55325",
    "simhash": "1:1ea10a0532798382",
    "word_count": 154
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:30.134660+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JOSEPH B. PATRICK v. SIR WALTER CHEVROLET COMPANY, a Corporation."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nPlaintiff here challenges the judgment as of nonsuit. After careful review and consideration of the evidence introduced by plaintiff and shown in the record, taken in the light most favorable to him, we concur in the ruling of the court below.\nThe judgment is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Grimes & Grimes for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Rodman & Rodman for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JOSEPH B. PATRICK v. SIR WALTER CHEVROLET COMPANY, a Corporation.\n(Filed 20 September, 1939.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Hamilton, Special Judge, at April Term, 1939, of Beaufort.\nCivil action for recovery of damages-for personal injury received in automobile collision, which, plaintiff alleges resulted from the actionable negligence of defendant.'\nThe material allegations of the complaint are denied by defendant.\nAt the close of evidence for plaintiff on the trial below the court granted motion of defendant for judgment as in case of nonsuit. From judgment in accordance therewith plaintiff appeals to the Supreme Court, and assigns error.\nGrimes & Grimes for plaintiff, appellant.\nRodman & Rodman for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0792-01",
  "first_page_order": 858,
  "last_page_order": 858
}