{
  "id": 8615267,
  "name": "M. N. TOXEY et al. v. W. B. MEGGS et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Toxey v. Meggs",
  "decision_date": "1939-09-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "798",
  "last_page": "798",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "216 N.C. 798"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "190 S. E., 735",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "211 N. C., 736",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629162,
        8629182
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/211/0736-01",
        "/nc/211/0736-02"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1084,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.519,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.454858700363489e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8049094754172926
    },
    "sha256": "9cce297b6b01cf047bad9cbab80384187d9a408e45f2087f9a1cbcf0032ecd11",
    "simhash": "1:8129838ba67b660f",
    "word_count": 179
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:30.134660+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "M. N. TOXEY et al. v. W. B. MEGGS et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nOne member of the Court, Winborne, J., not sitting, and the remaining six being evenly divided in opinion whether reversible error has been shown, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, accordant with the usual practice in such cases, and stands as the decision in the instant case, without becoming a precedent. Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N. C., 736, 190 S. E., 735, and cases there cited.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "M. B. Simpson and McMullan & McMullan for plaintiffs, appellees.",
      "Chester B. Morris and B. Clarence Dozier for defendants, appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "M. N. TOXEY et al. v. W. B. MEGGS et al.\n(Filed 27 September, 1939.)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 38\u2014\nWhen the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment o\u00ed the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.\nAppeal by defendants from Carr, J., at March Term, 1939, of CAMDEN.\nCivil action to restrain defendants from cutting timber on plaintiffs\u2019 land, and to recover damages for trespass already committed.\nFrom verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal, assigning errors.\nM. B. Simpson and McMullan & McMullan for plaintiffs, appellees.\nChester B. Morris and B. Clarence Dozier for defendants, appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0798-01",
  "first_page_order": 864,
  "last_page_order": 864
}