{
  "id": 8618366,
  "name": "STATE v. JOHN SAMIA",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Samia",
  "decision_date": "1940-10-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "307",
  "last_page": "307",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "218 N.C. 307"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "191 S. E., 18",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "211 N. C., 407",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8627184
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/211/0407-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "110 S. E., 844",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "183 N. C., 740",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8658778
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/183/0740-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "102 S. E., 318",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "179 N. C., 720",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8658327
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/179/0720-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1581,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.5,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2058583832707848e-07,
      "percentile": 0.594796260322513
    },
    "sha256": "a075cf013504a5503eacf75ad8786405158c2a11cfadcebf0795582861f58fc3",
    "simhash": "1:1632135892e83e9b",
    "word_count": 268
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:22:12.547739+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. JOHN SAMIA."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nA witness for the State testified that be bought a pint of whiskey from the defendant. The defendant offered no evidence. The only question was the credibility of the State\u2019s witness. The jury was satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of defendant\u2019s guilt and rendered verdict accordingly. In the trial we find\nNo error.\nMotion in Arrest oe Judgment.\nIn this Court defendant entered a motion in arrest of the judgment on the ground that the ease was transferred from the Craven County recorder\u2019s court to the Superior Court for trial, and that defendant was there tried upon the original warrant without a bill of indictment. This, procedure was authorized by statute, Public Laws 1929, ch. 115, sec. 2, and has been upheld by this Court in S. v. Publishing Co., 179 N. C., 720, 102 S. E., 318; S. v. Saleeby, 183 N. C., 740, 110 S. E., 844. See, also, S. v. Boykin, 211 N. C., 407, 191 S. E., 18.\nMotion in arrest of judgment denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton and Patton for the State.",
      "J. A. Jones for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. JOHN SAMIA.\n(Filed 16 October, 1940.)\nConstitutional Law \u00a7 26\u2014\nWhere a prosecution for unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors is transferred from the recorder\u2019s court to the Superior Court, defendant may be there tried upon the original warrant without a bill of indictment. Public Laws of 1929, ch. 115, see. 2.\nAppeal by defendant from Bone, J., at February Term, 1940, of GRAVEN.\nThe defendant was charged with unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. From judgment on verdict of guilty, defendant appealed.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton and Patton for the State.\nJ. A. Jones for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0307-01",
  "first_page_order": 375,
  "last_page_order": 375
}