{
  "id": 8626887,
  "name": "ROBERT ROUSE WILLIAMS v. JOHN R. ELSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "Williams v. Elson",
  "decision_date": "1941-02-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "861",
  "last_page": "862",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "219 N.C. 861"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "218 N. C., 157",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8614935
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/218/0157-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 917,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.508,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.207271543630536
    },
    "sha256": "8981318a7be3e6b202d19871530fed8c3b38c9aac6c91c9e76aabdac1185d28d",
    "simhash": "1:9729555feb013dbb",
    "word_count": 153
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:18.105136+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ROBERT ROUSE WILLIAMS v. JOHN R. ELSON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis is the same case that was here at the Fall Term, 1940, on plaintiff\u2019s appeal from a judgment of nonsuit, reported in 218 N. C., 157, 10 S. E. (2d), 668.\nIn the present trial, which was limited to issues arising on plaintiff\u2019s allegations of breach of warranty, there seems to be no substantial departure from the rules of procedure, as plaintiff alleges. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ford & Lee for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Harkins, Van Winkle & Walton for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ROBERT ROUSE WILLIAMS v. JOHN R. ELSON.\n(Filed 26 February, 1941.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Nettles, J., at December Term, 1940, of BuNcombe.\nCivil action for breach of warranty in the sale of food for human consumption.\nUpon denial of liability and issues joined, the jury answered the issue of warranty in favor of the defendant.\nFrom judgment on the verdict, the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.\nFord & Lee for plaintiff, appellant.\nHarkins, Van Winkle & Walton for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0861-01",
  "first_page_order": 903,
  "last_page_order": 904
}