{
  "id": 8626945,
  "name": "J. A. VINSON v. P. L. EVERETTE, Trading as A. & E. TRUCK LINE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Vinson v. Everette",
  "decision_date": "1941-03-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "862",
  "last_page": "863",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "219 N.C. 862"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1393,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.489,
    "sha256": "a8a667bf0f29c43f6bc22574114a0dcd145db9e501d9fe7d5011de81ebfd2b5e",
    "simhash": "1:e93f9fee8158b54c",
    "word_count": 228
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:18.105136+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. A. VINSON v. P. L. EVERETTE, Trading as A. & E. TRUCK LINE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Peb Cubiam.\nThere being evidence to support tbe verdict of tbe jury in favor of tbe defendant on tbe issue of contributory negligence, tbe judgment dismissing tbe action must be upheld, unless there was error in tbe admission of evidence or in tbe charge of tbe court addressed to that issue. A careful examination of tbe record leads us to tbe conclusion that tbe exceptions to tbe admission of testimony and to tbe instructions given by tbe court to tbe jury are without substantial merit.\nIn tbe trial we find\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Peb Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. Faison Thomson and Scott B. Berkeley for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Royall, Gosney & Smith and James Glenn for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. A. VINSON v. P. L. EVERETTE, Trading as A. & E. TRUCK LINE.\n(Filed 19 March, 1941.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from NimocJcs, J., September Term, 1940, of Wayne.\nNo error.\nThis was an action to recover damages for personal injury growing-out of collision between the plaintiff\u2019s automobile and the defendant\u2019s truck, at a street crossing in Goldsboro. The defendant set up the defense of contributory negligence. Issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages were submitted to tbe jury. Tbe jury answered tbe issue addressed to tbe defendant\u2019s negligence in favor of plaintiff, but found that tbe plaintiff by bis own negligence contributed to bis injury. From judgment on tbe verdict in favor of defendant, tbe plaintiff appealed.\nJ. Faison Thomson and Scott B. Berkeley for plaintiff, appellant.\nRoyall, Gosney & Smith and James Glenn for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0862-02",
  "first_page_order": 904,
  "last_page_order": 905
}