{
  "id": 11299371,
  "name": "JESSIE HENDRIX v. HARRY'S CADILLAC COMPANY, INC., and GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hendrix v. Harry's Cadillac Co.",
  "decision_date": "1941-09-24",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "84",
  "last_page": "84",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "220 N.C. 84"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1152,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.493,
    "sha256": "4fb4ec0267bebf30cf01e0cc7c5001cc7011e873681fb3dbdc830b0fc8286597",
    "simhash": "1:53ea7dafc358ba6c",
    "word_count": 193
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:44:04.432821+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JESSIE HENDRIX v. HARRY\u2019S CADILLAC COMPANY, INC., and GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Oueiam.\nThis is an action under C. S., 2306, to recover an amount of alleged usurious interest paid by the plaintiff to the defendants in a transaction involving the purchase and sale of a second-hand automobile, with deferred payments secured by conditional sale contract.\nAn examination of the evidence convinces us that the transaction involved was indeed a sale and not a loan, and therefore the cause of action alleged by the plaintiff is not sustained by the evidence. Note, 48 A. L. R., p. 1442; 57 A. L. R., p. 880; 91 A. L. R., p. 1105.\nThe judgment of the Superior Court is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Oueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Geo. F. Meadows for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Chas. G. Lee, Jr., and James S. Howell for defendants, appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JESSIE HENDRIX v. HARRY\u2019S CADILLAC COMPANY, INC., and GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION.\n(Filed 24 September, 1941.)\nUsury \u00a7 2\u2014\nAn action to recover alleged usurious interest paid cannot be maintained upon evidence disclosing that the transaction alleged was not a loan but was a sale with deferred payment secured by conditional sale contract. C. S., 2306.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Johnston, Special Judge, at April Term, 1941, of BuNCOMbe.\nGeo. F. Meadows for plaintiff, appellant.\nChas. G. Lee, Jr., and James S. Howell for defendants, appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0084-01",
  "first_page_order": 128,
  "last_page_order": 128
}