{
  "id": 8627037,
  "name": "RALEIGH BUILDING CORPORATION v. P. B. RODGERS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Raleigh Building Corp. v. Rodgers",
  "decision_date": "1942-04-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "204",
  "last_page": "204",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "221 N.C. 204"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1525,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.466,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7531485426370418
    },
    "sha256": "246c0546399f5cf3cd48241a9ddd4e94e690275f855d3fb98d8754cb2e392d19",
    "simhash": "1:0f32e4dbd21300f8",
    "word_count": 248
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:01:36.695844+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "RALEIGH BUILDING CORPORATION v. P. B. RODGERS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cukiam.\nUpon the trial below evidence for plaintiff tended to show that the number of shares to be subscribed, upon which defendant\u2019s subscription was conditioned, had not been subscribed either when the corporation was organized in 1931, or on the date of the institution of this action. And on argument here counsel for plaintiff states that it is not contended that defendant, when in 1931 he made six payments on his subscription, had knowledge of the fact that the total subscription for stock was less than the specified number of shares.\nIn the light of these facts, the judgment below is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cukiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Paul F. Smith for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Briggs & West for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "RALEIGH BUILDING CORPORATION v. P. B. RODGERS.\n(Filed 15 April, 1942.)\nSubscription \u00a7 3\u2014\nDefendant\u2019s subscription to stock in plaintiff corporation was conditioned upon the subscription by others of a stated number of shares. Sold: In the absence of evidence that the stated number of shares had been subscribed prior to the institution of the action, or that defendant, at the time he made payments on his subscription, had knowledge of the fact that the specified number of shares had not been subscribed, defendant\u2019s motion for judgment as of nonsuit is properly granted.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Carr, J., at January Term, 1942, of Wake.\nCivil action to recover upon conditional stock subscription.\nUpon plaintiff resting its case motion for judgment as of nonsuit was allowed. Plaintiff appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.\nPaul F. Smith for plaintiff, appellant.\nBriggs & West for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0204-01",
  "first_page_order": 240,
  "last_page_order": 240
}