{
  "id": 8628562,
  "name": "WILLIAM PETERSON v. ALPHONSO McLAMB and Wife, EUTHA McLAMB",
  "name_abbreviation": "Peterson v. McLamb",
  "decision_date": "1942-04-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "538",
  "last_page": "538",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "221 N.C. 538"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1137,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.46,
    "sha256": "97237bb0862df0172a742b20f7e340c888b00188dfd9d9df45765bf985cfd1cc",
    "simhash": "1:d2f9b312f6790e8b",
    "word_count": 187
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:01:36.695844+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WILLIAM PETERSON v. ALPHONSO McLAMB and Wife, EUTHA McLAMB."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cueiam.\nPlaintiff appealed from a judgment of the Superior Court holding that upon the facts found by the referee the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. This Court being evenly divided in opinion as to the correctness of this ruling, Justice Schenck not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, without becoming a precedent.\nThe death of the plaintiff pending appeal having been suggested, upon her motion Eva L. Peterson, administratrix, is made party plaintiff in lieu of William Peterson, the decedent. Rule 37.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jno. B. Williams, Jr., and P. D. Herring for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "E. J. W.ellons for defendants, appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILLIAM PETERSON v. ALPHONSO McLAMB and Wife, EUTHA McLAMB.\n(Filed 8 April, 1942.)\n1. Appeal and Error \u00a7 38\u2014\nWhen the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.\n2. Appeal and Error \u00a7 3b\u2014\nWhen a party dies pending appeal, his administratrix will be substituted as a party upon motion. Rule 37.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Carr, J., at September Term, 1941, of SAMPSON.\nJno. B. Williams, Jr., and P. D. Herring for plaintiff, appellant.\nE. J. W.ellons for defendants, appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0538-01",
  "first_page_order": 574,
  "last_page_order": 574
}