{
  "id": 8631655,
  "name": "STATE v. O. B. WILLIAMS and LILLIE SHAVER HENDRIX",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Williams",
  "decision_date": "1943-02-24",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "609",
  "last_page": "609",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "222 N.C. 609"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "220 N. C., 445",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11304913,
        8628670
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/220/0445-01",
        "/nc/221/0542-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "87 L. Ed., 189",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "L. Ed.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "220 N. C., 445",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11304913,
        8628670
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/220/0445-01",
        "/nc/221/0542-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 1958,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.48,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.08144488979023e-08,
      "percentile": 0.42615573340376217
    },
    "sha256": "0a4c91b69e5b3f5d4134062e646b39f6e55f93fd2cb440e75e6c7d3256a584f4",
    "simhash": "1:f88dd4463606967b",
    "word_count": 314
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:48:14.759571+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. O. B. WILLIAMS and LILLIE SHAVER HENDRIX."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe judgment heretofore entered in this cause upholding the conviction and judgments entered at the February-March Term, Caldwell Superior Court, reported in 220 N. C., 445, 17 S. E. (2d), 769, will be vacated or set aside, and the cause remanded for a new trial in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, rendered 21 December, 1942, on certiorari to this Court. See O. B. Williams and Lillie Shaver Hendrix, petitioners, v. State of North Carolina, 317 U. S., ... , 87 L. Ed., 189, decided 21 December, 1942. Accordingly, the defendants will recover their costs incurred in the Supreme Court of the United States, and the costs heretofore assessed in this Court will be retaxed.\nJudgment vacated; new trial ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Patton and Rhodes for the State.",
      "W. H. Strickland for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. O. B. WILLIAMS and LILLIE SHAVER HENDRIX.\n(Filed 24 February, 1943.)\nConstitutional Law \u00a7 23 \u2014 Pull Faith and Credit.\nJudgment herein upholding conviction, 220 N. C., 445, vacated or set aside and cause remanded for a new trial, in accordance with opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, rendered 21 December, 1942, on certiorari. And defendants will recover their costs. '\nON mandate from Supreme Court'of the United States.\nCriminal prosecution tried in Caldwell County upon indictment charging the defendants with bigamy in violation of C. S., 4342.\nYerdiet: Guilty as charged in the bill of indictment.\nJudgments: Imprisonment in the State\u2019s Prison for terms specifically set out.\nThe defendants appealed, assigning errors.\nYerdict and judgments' were upheld at the Fall Term, 1941, reported in 220 N. C., 445, 17 S. E. (2d), 769.\nThe defendants applied to the Supreme Court of the United States for writ of certiorari, which was granted 30 March, 1942, and the judgment of affirmance \u201creversed\u201d 21 December, 1942. Mandate received 28 January, 1943.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Patton and Rhodes for the State.\nW. H. Strickland for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0609-01",
  "first_page_order": 653,
  "last_page_order": 653
}