{
  "id": 8619632,
  "name": "WILLIAM MONROE BLYTHE, Employee, v. R. C. WELBORN, Doing Business as R. C. WELBORN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer, and BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION, Carrier",
  "name_abbreviation": "Blythe v. Welborn",
  "decision_date": "1943-05-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "857",
  "last_page": "857",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "223 N.C. 857"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "219 N. C., 521",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8625079
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/219/0521-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "220 N. C., 135",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11299751
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/220/0135-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "222 N. C., 23",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628177
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/222/0023-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 937,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.486,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20720011089449616
    },
    "sha256": "097703ac95a3a461be54755b37e3551026e455df3f65f92e6ee16c8865571db3",
    "simhash": "1:031f166e12ba2d46",
    "word_count": 155
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:13:50.990749+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WILLIAM MONROE BLYTHE, Employee, v. R. C. WELBORN, Doing Business as R. C. WELBORN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer, and BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION, Carrier."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nPlaintiff, employee, brings tbis action under tbe provisions of tbe Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, against tbe employer and insurance carrier, to obtain compensation for injuries.\nThere is evidence to support tbe findings of fact by tbe Commission, upon wbicb tbe liability of tbe defendants is declared, and we find no error in tbe conclusions of law, or in tbe judgment of tbe court below affirming tbe award.. Eller v. Leather Co., 222 N. C., 23, 21 S. E. (2d), 809; Blevins v. Teer, 220 N. C., 135, 16 S. E., (2d), 659; Beach McLean, 219 N. C., 521, 14 S. E. (2d), 515.\nTbe judgment is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roberson, Haworth & Reese for plaintiff.",
      "Sapp & Sapp for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WILLIAM MONROE BLYTHE, Employee, v. R. C. WELBORN, Doing Business as R. C. WELBORN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer, and BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION, Carrier.\n(Filed 19 May, 1943.)\nAppeal by defendants from Bobbitt, J., at February Term, 1943, of Guilford.\nRoberson, Haworth & Reese for plaintiff.\nSapp & Sapp for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0857-01",
  "first_page_order": 909,
  "last_page_order": 909
}