{
  "id": 8619795,
  "name": "WALTER HAWKINS, NORA A. HAWKINS, D. C. ARRINGTON, ROSETTA ARRINGTON, DOLLIA ARRINGTON, STELLA ARRINGTON and SABINA PERKINS, v. THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hawkins v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia",
  "decision_date": "1943-09-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "858",
  "last_page": "858",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "223 N.C. 858"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "221 N. C., 546",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "221 N. C., 73",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626124
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/221/0073-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1021,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.473,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20720204150898372
    },
    "sha256": "66d4936f9059e0656ccb8b86c89ce1087f5baea17db5bac46fa1bbae25b0ae5d",
    "simhash": "1:8da6ce424976e9e8",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:13:50.990749+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WALTER HAWKINS, NORA A. HAWKINS, D. C. ARRINGTON, ROSETTA ARRINGTON, DOLLIA ARRINGTON, STELLA ARRINGTON and SABINA PERKINS, v. THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis case was here on a former appeal. See Hawkins v. Land Bank, 221 N. C., 73, 18 S. E. (2d), 823, where the essential facts are stated. This appeal should have been docketed at the Spring Term. Rule 5, 221 N. C., 546. Be that as it may, the jury has decided the controverted facts in favor of the defendant. The exceptive assignments of error relied upon by the plaintiffs are without substantial merit. The judgment entered must be sustained.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Keel & Keel for plaintiffs, appellants.",
      "Wade H. Dickens for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WALTER HAWKINS, NORA A. HAWKINS, D. C. ARRINGTON, ROSETTA ARRINGTON, DOLLIA ARRINGTON, STELLA ARRINGTON and SABINA PERKINS, v. THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA.\n(Filed 29 September, 1943.)\nAppeal by plaintiffs from Frizzelle, J., at November-December Term, 1942, of Halifax. No error.\nCivil action to vacate foreclosure deed.\nAppropriate issues were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the defendant. From judgment thereon plaintiffs appealed.\nKeel & Keel for plaintiffs, appellants.\nWade H. Dickens for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0858-01",
  "first_page_order": 910,
  "last_page_order": 910
}