{
  "id": 8619965,
  "name": "JESSIE S. MORTON v. WHITE PARKS MILLS COMPANY, a Corporation",
  "name_abbreviation": "Morton v. White Parks Mills Co.",
  "decision_date": "1943-11-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "860",
  "last_page": "860",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "223 N.C. 860"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 841,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.484,
    "sha256": "b3feead070f247bd0a0d7d421cd377d6e60a841d882f8edab0d6bfb5d407ead3",
    "simhash": "1:1170aad8b767119d",
    "word_count": 140
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:13:50.990749+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "JESSIE S. MORTON v. WHITE PARKS MILLS COMPANY, a Corporation."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe decision of this case turns upon the status of plaintiff as an employee of defendant. The facts appearing on this record disclose that he is an \u201cexecutive\u201d as defined by the Administrator of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Pye v. Atlantic Co., ante, 92, is in point. On authority of that decision the judgment below is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bernard W. Gruse for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Hartsell & Uarisell for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JESSIE S. MORTON v. WHITE PARKS MILLS COMPANY, a Corporation.\n(Filed 3 November, 1943.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Burgwyn, Special Judge, at June Term, 1943, Cabarrus.\nAffirmed.\nCivil action to recover wages and liquidated damages due under the terms of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Sec. 52, Stat. 1060, U. S. Code, Title 29.\nThere was a judgment of nonsuit in the court below, and plaintiff appealed.\nBernard W. Gruse for plaintiff, appellant.\nHartsell & Uarisell for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0860-01",
  "first_page_order": 912,
  "last_page_order": 912
}