#### STATE v. RALPH RIVERS.

(Filed 2 June, 1944.)

Homicide § 25—

In a prosecution for murder, tlie evidence tending to show that the prisoner killed deceased, while the two were quarreling over some trivial matters, defendant admitting the killing hut alleging that he shot deceased to repel an assault, the issue is for the jury and demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled. G. S., 15-173.

Appeal by defendant from Garr, J., at November Term, 1948, of ALAMANCE.

Criminal prosecution tried upon indictment charging the defendant with the murder of one Haywood Loy.

Yerdiet: Guilty of manslaughter.

Judgment: Imprisonment in the State’s Prison for not less than four nor more than six years.

The defendant appeals, assigning errors.

Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Patton and Rhodes for the State.

P. W. Glidewell, Sr., for defendant.

Stacy, C. J.

The record discloses that on 15 May, 1943, the defendant shot and killed his father-in-law at the defendant’s home near Burlington, Alamance County, while the two were quarreling over some trivial domestic matters. The defendant admitted firing the shot which killed the deceased, but he says he shot to repel an assault without any felonious intent. The’ issue was for the jury under the evidence disclosed by the record, and they have found an unlawful killing or manslaughter. The demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled. G. S., 15-173 (formerly C. S., 4643); S. v. Johnson, 184 N. C., 637, 113 S. E., 617; S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682, 153 S. E., 155.

The remaining' exceptions are to portions of the charge. No authority is cited in support of the defendant’s position, and we have found no error in the trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.