{
  "id": 8616997,
  "name": "H. J. LEE v. BESSIE DRIGGERS, Administratrix of ROSA PARHAM, Deceased",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lee v. Driggers",
  "decision_date": "1944-04-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "857",
  "last_page": "858",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "224 N.C. 857"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 95,
    "char_count": 887,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.49,
    "sha256": "7e652c31363804b02fa2f8a145bfa8abf50acf6e877c7b92c11d510090607b54",
    "simhash": "1:87ea658446353a1b",
    "word_count": 150
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:53:33.218655+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "H. J. LEE v. BESSIE DRIGGERS, Administratrix of ROSA PARHAM, Deceased."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nUpon the pleadings in the case the liability of the estate of Rosa Parham, deceased, was made to depend upon whether she signed the note by way of accommodation to her son, J. M. Parham. It was largely a question of fact which the jury has settled. And the case on appeal fails to show prejudicial error.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. M. Templeton for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Briggs & West for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "H. J. LEE v. BESSIE DRIGGERS, Administratrix of ROSA PARHAM, Deceased.\n(Filed 19 April, 1944.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Harris, J., at November Term, 1943, of Wake.\nCivil action for recovery on a negotiable note, to which defendant pleads the three-year statute of limitations. G. S., 1-52, formerly C. S., 441.\nThe case was tried upon a single issue of indebtedness \u2014 to which, the jury answered \u201cNo.\u201d From judgment thereon plaintiff appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.\nJ. M. Templeton for plaintiff, appellant.\nBriggs & West for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0857-02",
  "first_page_order": 905,
  "last_page_order": 906
}