{
  "id": 8616959,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Ex Rel. H. EDMUND RODGERS, Admr. c. t. a. of Estate of R. L. FOX, v. O. E. TODD and B. F. BRITTAIN, JR., Executors of Estate of R. L. FOX, Deceased, and INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA",
  "name_abbreviation": "State ex rel. Rodgers v. Todd",
  "decision_date": "1945-12-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "689",
  "last_page": "690",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "225 N.C. 689"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "223 N. C., 840",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8619129
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/223/0840-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "221 N. C., 249",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8627359
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/221/0249-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "215 N. C., 120",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628439
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/215/0120-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 174,
    "char_count": 1891,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.498,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.8397096928990165e-08,
      "percentile": 0.30390864486694014
    },
    "sha256": "e19d995bea17b6f75054ecbf02012aca05fe870529d00d3abd204c9a00ef24e7",
    "simhash": "1:95c99943bf0b479c",
    "word_count": 327
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:44.450219+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Ex Rel. H. EDMUND RODGERS, Admr. c. t. a. of Estate of R. L. FOX, v. O. E. TODD and B. F. BRITTAIN, JR., Executors of Estate of R. L. FOX, Deceased, and INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis was an action by tbe administrator c. t. a. of tbe estate of R. L. Eox against former executors of tbe estate and tbe surety on tbeir bond to recover for losses alleged to bave been sustained by tbe estate due to failure to account for certain funds collected and for negligent failure to collect others. Tbe defendants, among other defenses, pleaded several statutes of limitation, and moved tbe court for judgment declaring plaintiff\u2019s action barred, and for judgment on tbe pleadings.\nTbe court below held that neither of tbe statutes of limitation pleaded constituted a bar, and denied tbe motion. Defendants excepted and appealed.\nIt is apparent that defendants\u2019 appeal is both premature and fragmentary. No final judgment has been rendered, and no substantial rights of the. defendants bave been affected by tbe ruling which cannot be protected by an exception and appeal from tbe final judgment, if adverse. Only part of tbe case has been brought up, leaving other parts unsettled. Johnson v. Ins. Co., 215 N. C., 120, 1 S. E. (2d), 381; Cole v. Trust Co., 221 N. C., 249, 20 S. E. (2d), 348; Utilities Com. v. R. R., 223 N. C., 840, 28 S. E. (2d), 490; McIntosh Prac. & Proc., 776. No appeal lies from tbe denial of motion for judgment on tbe pleadings.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Poisson & Campbell for plaintiff.",
      "Stevens & Burgwyn for defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Ex Rel. H. EDMUND RODGERS, Admr. c. t. a. of Estate of R. L. FOX, v. O. E. TODD and B. F. BRITTAIN, JR., Executors of Estate of R. L. FOX, Deceased, and INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.\n(Filed 12 December, 1945.)\n1. Appeal and Error \u00a7 30b\u2014\nAn appeal which is both premature and fragmentary will be dismissed.\n2.- Same\u2014\nNo appeal lies from the denial of motion for judgment on the pleadings.\nAppeal by defendants from Williams, J., at October Term, 1945, of New HaNovee. Appeal dismissed.\nPoisson & Campbell for plaintiff.\nStevens & Burgwyn for defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0689-01",
  "first_page_order": 737,
  "last_page_order": 738
}