{ "id": 8618695, "name": "A. C. JORDAN et ux v. J. H. HARRIS et al.", "name_abbreviation": "Jordan v. Harris", "decision_date": "1945-12-17", "docket_number": "", "first_page": "763", "last_page": "765", "citations": [ { "type": "official", "cite": "225 N.C. 763" } ], "court": { "name_abbreviation": "N.C.", "id": 9292, "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina" }, "jurisdiction": { "id": 5, "name_long": "North Carolina", "name": "N.C." }, "cites_to": [ { "cite": "224 N. C., 359", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8602462 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/224/0359-01" ] }, { "cite": "199 S. E., 393", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.", "opinion_index": 0 }, { "cite": "214 N. C., 396", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8630936 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/214/0396-01" ] }, { "cite": "215 N. C., 449", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8630171 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/215/0449-01" ] }, { "cite": "10 S. E., 1019", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.", "opinion_index": 0 }, { "cite": "106 N. C., 567", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8651813 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/106/0567-01" ] }, { "cite": "26 S. E., 700", "category": "reporters:state_regional", "reporter": "S.E.", "opinion_index": 0 }, { "cite": "120 N. C., 56", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8656209 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/120/0056-01" ] }, { "cite": "216 N. C., 270", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8597960 ], "weight": 2, "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/216/0270-01" ] }, { "cite": "217 N. C., 279", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8605077 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/217/0279-01" ] }, { "cite": "223 N. C., 442", "category": "reporters:state", "reporter": "N.C.", "case_ids": [ 8611013 ], "opinion_index": 0, "case_paths": [ "/nc/223/0442-01" ] } ], "analysis": { "cardinality": 352, "char_count": 5022, "ocr_confidence": 0.5, "pagerank": { "raw": 9.505882454708161e-08, "percentile": 0.5231057872486002 }, "sha256": "c5425842090e7a33b8913f7f9d8697522e1716fd5ec9b79360a51eee5b95d11c", "simhash": "1:4635d61110fb3ca8", "word_count": 853 }, "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:44.450219+00:00", "provenance": { "date_added": "2019-08-29", "source": "Harvard", "batch": "2018" }, "casebody": { "judges": [], "parties": [ "A. C. JORDAN et ux v. J. H. HARRIS et al." ], "opinions": [ { "text": "Stacy, C. J.\nBy tbe terms of G. S., 18-45, authority is vested in tbe A.B.C. Boards of tbe respective counties to appoint one or more law enforcement officers witb \u201ctbe same powers and authorities within their respective counties as other peace officers.\u201d Subsection (0). Peace officers are required to give bond for tbe faithful discharge of their duties. G. S., 128-9; S. v. Swanson, 223 N. C., 442, 27 S. E. (2d), 122. Tbe law provides that such officers, and tbe sureties on their official bonds, shall be liable to tbe persons injured for torts committed colore officii. Dunn v. Swanson, 217 N. C., 279, 7 S. E. (2d), 563; Price v. Honeycutt, 216 N. C., 270, 4 S. E. (2d), 611; Warren v. Boyd, 120 N. C., 56, 26 S. E., 700; Kivett v. Young, 106 N. C., 567, 10 S. E., 1019; G. S., 109-1; 109-34.\nTbe case was tried under tbe principles announced in Dunn v. Swanson, supra, and Price v. Honeycutt, supra. In this, there was no error. Tbe decisions in Davis v. Moore, 215 N. C., 449, 2 S. E. (2d), 366, and Midgett v. Nelson, 214 N. C., 396, 199 S. E., 393, are inapposite to tbe facts of tbe present record.\nTbe naming of tbe Durham County A.B.G. Board as obligee in tbe bond, rather than tbe State, works no limitation of its character as an official bond and affords no escape from its obligations as such. G. S., 109-1. See Hunter v. Retirement System, 224 N. C., 359, 30 S. E. (2d), 384.\nTbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.", "type": "majority", "author": "Stacy, C. J." } ], "attorneys": [ "R. M. Gantt for plaintiffs, appellees.", "Fuller, Reade, Umstead & Fuller for defendants, appellants." ], "corrections": "", "head_matter": "A. C. JORDAN et ux v. J. H. HARRIS et al.\n(Filed 17 December, 1945.)\n1. Intoxicating Liquors \u00a7 3: Public Officers \u00a7\u00a7 1, 2\u2014\nBy G. S., 18-45, authority is vested in the A.B.O. Boards of the respective counties to appoint one or more law enforcement officers with \u201cthe same powers and authorities in their respective counties as other peace officers.\u201d Subsection O.\n3. Public Officers \u00a7\u00a7 4, 8: Principal and Surety \u00a7 5a\u2014\nPeace officers are required to give bond for the faithful discharge of their duties. G. S., 128-9. The law provides that such officers, and the sureties on their official bonds, shall be liable to the persons injured for torts committed colore officii.\nS. Public Officers \u00a7 8\u2014\nThe naming of the Durham A.B.O. Board as obligee in a bond of its law enforcement officers, rather than the State, works no limitation of its character as an official bond and affords no escape from its obligation as such.\nAppeal by defendants, George T. Eeatherstone and American Bonding Company, from Jeff D. Johnson, Jr., Special Judge, at June Term, 1945, of DURHAM.\nCivil action to recover of Durham County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board; George T. Eeatherstone, its chief enforcement officer, and surety on his bond, damages for negligently allowing fire at a captured still to spread over plaintiffs\u2019 timber lands.\nOn the night of 12 December, 1943, a distillery which was being operated on plaintiffs\u2019 land, without his knowledge or consent, was raided by the Durham County A.B.C. Board enforcement squad, led by George T. Eeatherstone, the chief enforcement officer. After making an unsuccessful attempt to arrest the operators, who made good their escape, the officers undertook to destroy the still. The boxes and barrels used in connection with the still and about 35 gallons of whiskey were thrown on the fire, which added to its intensity. It is alleged that through the negligence of the defendants, the fire was allowed to spread to plaintiffs\u2019 woods, and they bring this action to recover for the destruction of their timber.\nWhen George T. Eeatherstone was appointed Chief Enforcement Officer, he gave bond in the sum of $1,000 to-the Durham County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, with the American Bonding Company as surety and conditioned as follows :\n\u201cThe Condition of the Aforegoing Obligation Is Such, That Whereas, the Principal was elected or appointed Chief Enforcement Officer: Now, Therefore, if the Principal shall during the term of one year beginning-on the 15th day of December, 1942, well and faithfully perform all and singly the duties incumbent upon him by reason of his election or appointment as aforesaid, and honestly account for all moneys coming into his hands as such officer, according to law, except as hereinafter limited, during said term, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise of full force and virtue.\u201d\nAt the close of the evidence, judgments of nonsuit were entered in favor of the defendants, with the exception of George T. Eeatherstone and his bondsman.\nThe jury returned the following verdict :\n\u201c1. Was the plaintiffs\u2019 land burned over and damaged by the negligence of the defendant, George T. Eeatherstone, acting by virtue or under color of his office as Chief Enforcement Officer of the Durham County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board? Answer: Yes.\n\u201c2. \"What damages, if any, are tbe plaintiffs entitled to recover? Answer: $512.00.\u201d\nFrom judgment on tbe verdict, tbe defendants appeal, assigning errors.\nR. M. Gantt for plaintiffs, appellees.\nFuller, Reade, Umstead & Fuller for defendants, appellants." }, "file_name": "0763-01", "first_page_order": 811, "last_page_order": 813 }