{
  "id": 8619769,
  "name": "STATE v. DUNCAN THOMAS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Thomas",
  "decision_date": "1946-05-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "384",
  "last_page": "384",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "226 N.C. 384"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "137 S. E., 175",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "193 N. C., 428",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2217692
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/193/0428-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1111,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.46,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2072016553860862
    },
    "sha256": "16203e26cf4e32185627ccbd9ee1f1976a2fd2179d310a2fab25ef6c0584426d",
    "simhash": "1:03287a96828c9cd1",
    "word_count": 183
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:42.041183+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. DUNCAN THOMAS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe defendant\u2019s only exception was to the charge of the court for failure to \u201ccharge the law and facts relative to this case.\u201d As frankly admitted in defendant\u2019s brief this is unpointed broadside. Rawls v. Lupton, 193 N. C., 428, 137 S. E., 175. The record shows the trial free from error. The Attorney-General moves in this Court that the judgment below be affirmed. The defendant does not resist the motion.\nThe motion is allowed, and the judgment\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Rhodes for the State.",
      "Franklin S. Clark and H. S. Kirkpatrick for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. DUNCAN THOMAS.\n(Filed 22 May, 1946.)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 78e\u2014\nAn exception to the charge for failure to \u201ccharge the law and facts relative to this case\u201d is an unpointed broadside exception.\nAppeal by defendant from Burney, J., at November Term, 1945, of Hoee. Motion to affirm the judgment allowed.\nThe defendant was charged in two bills of indictment with receiving stolen goods knowing them to have been stolen. From judgment upon verdict of guilty in both cases, the defendant appealed.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Rhodes for the State.\nFranklin S. Clark and H. S. Kirkpatrick for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0384-01",
  "first_page_order": 432,
  "last_page_order": 432
}