{
  "id": 8621419,
  "name": "STATE v. JESSIE FARRAR",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Farrar",
  "decision_date": "1946-06-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "478",
  "last_page": "479",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "226 N.C. 478"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "222 N. C., 137",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629015
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/222/0137-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "225 N. C., 213",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8603852
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/225/0213-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 166,
    "char_count": 1841,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.486,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.317852702137001e-08,
      "percentile": 0.43887674532376214
    },
    "sha256": "8759066ad558bce20a0912c60421d97f0961c0e4893078f8928e4cfffe52a362",
    "simhash": "1:8f1e794d6a2ee6f9",
    "word_count": 299
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:42.041183+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. JESSIE FARRAR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nOn tbe record as it appears in this Court, tbe motion of tbe State to dismiss tbe appeal is allowed on authority of S. v. Miller, 225 N. C., 213, 34 S. E. (2d), 143, and cases cited, including S. v. King, 222 N. C., 137, 22 S. E. (2d), 241.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Rhodes, Moody, and Tucker for the State.",
      "A. A. McDonald for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. JESSIE FARRAR.\n(Filed 5 June, 1946.)\nCriminal Raw \u00a7\u00a7 63, 68b\u2014\nNo appeal lies from an order that a suspended judgment be executed upon findings that defendant had violated the conditions upon which judgment was suspended.\nAppeal by defendant from Frizzelle, J., at March Term, 1946, of ORANGE.\nCriminal prosecution upon warrant issued out of the recorder\u2019s court of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, charging defendant with unlawful possession of \u201cnon tax paid liquor\u201d \u201cfor the purpose of sale,\u201d etc. Upon trial defendant was found guilty and sentenced to jail for specified term \u2014 the judgment being suspended upon conditions stated. Thereafter, upon hearing on \u201corder to show cause,\u201d the judge of recorder\u2019s court, finding as a fact that defendant bad violated tbe conditions upon wbicb tbe said judgment was suspended, ordered tbe jail sentence into effect. Defendant, in open court, gave notice of appeal. Tbe court, being of opinion tbat no appeal is provided in sucb case, denied tbe motion. Whereupon, defendant started serving tbe sentence, and was released upon habeas corpus. Sbe tben gave bond for appearance in Superior Court of Orange County. On bearing there tbe presiding judge \u2022approved and confirmed tbe judgment of recorder\u2019s court, and ordered same into execution. Defendant appeals therefrom to tbe Supreme Court. And tbe Attorney-General for tbe State moves to dismiss tbe appeal for lack of jurisdiction.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Rhodes, Moody, and Tucker for the State.\nA. A. McDonald for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0478-01",
  "first_page_order": 526,
  "last_page_order": 527
}