{
  "id": 8627501,
  "name": "MRS. MATTIE BOYAN v. DUKE POWER COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Boyan v. Duke Power Co.",
  "decision_date": "1946-12-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "697",
  "last_page": "698",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "227 N.C. 697"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 909,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.482,
    "sha256": "a6fe367839c8366ce094fdfd6a87bd8cb7eda8a53854f634810ae4439df7bee4",
    "simhash": "1:220a24ae5911adb0",
    "word_count": 150
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:20:04.384970+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MRS. MATTIE BOYAN v. DUKE POWER COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe exceptions have been carefully considered. They present no new questions of law. The case was one for the jury and it has spoken in a trial free from prejudicial error. Hence, in the trial below we find\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Gold, McAnally\u25a0 & Gold for plaintiff.",
      "W. 8. O\u2019B. Robinson, Jr., Horace 8. Haworth, Owen Reese, and Carter Dalton for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MRS. MATTIE BOYAN v. DUKE POWER COMPANY.\n(Filed 11 December, 1946.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Burgwyn, Special Judge, at March Term, 1946, of Guileobd (High Point Division).\nCivil action to recover damages, alleged to have been sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant, a common carrier of passengers, when plaintiff was invited to alight from one of defendant\u2019s buses at a dangerous and unsafe place.\nThe issue of negligence was answered in favor of the defendant and judgment entered accordingly.\nThe plaintiff appeals, assigning error.\nGold, McAnally\u25a0 & Gold for plaintiff.\nW. 8. O\u2019B. Robinson, Jr., Horace 8. Haworth, Owen Reese, and Carter Dalton for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0697-02",
  "first_page_order": 745,
  "last_page_order": 746
}